BUSE
Price
$22.75
Change
-$0.45 (-1.94%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.33B
5 days until earnings call
MCBS
Price
$31.20
Change
-$0.32 (-1.02%)
Updated
Jan 23, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
629.13M
85 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BUSE vs MCBS

Header iconBUSE vs MCBS Comparison
Open Charts BUSE vs MCBSBanner chart's image
First Busey
Price$22.75
Change-$0.45 (-1.94%)
Volume$268.62K
Capitalization1.33B
MetroCity Bankshares
Price$31.20
Change-$0.32 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization629.13M
BUSE vs MCBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. MCBS commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a Hold and MCBS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BUSE: $22.75 vs. MCBS: $31.52)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 109% vs. MCBS: 91%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $1.33B vs. MCBS: $629.13M
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.33B. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $629.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCBS is a better buy in the long-term than BUSE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BUSE and MCBS are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.30% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.85% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUSE($1.33B) has a higher market cap than MCBS($629M). MCBS has higher P/E ratio than BUSE: MCBS (11.86) vs BUSE (10.79). MCBS YTD gains are higher at: -1.346 vs. BUSE (-3.479). MCBS has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. BUSE (142M). MCBS (334M) and BUSE (336M) have identical debt. BUSE has higher revenues than MCBS: BUSE (442M) vs MCBS (118M).
BUSEMCBSBUSE / MCBS
Capitalization1.33B629M211%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.479-1.346258%
P/E Ratio10.7911.8691%
Revenue442M118M375%
Total Cash142M251M57%
Total Debt336M334M101%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9625
SMR RATING
1..100
1525
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7546
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4142
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BUSE's Valuation (41) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCBS (94) in the null industry. This means that BUSE’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BUSE (96) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew significantly faster than BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (25) in the null industry. This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BUSE (75) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (42) in the null industry. This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSEMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMDEX50.05N/A
N/A
Praxis Growth Index I
CMPCX20.69-0.09
-0.43%
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap C
OALVX19.11-0.10
-0.52%
Optimum Large Cap Value A
DFSGX25.51-0.15
-0.58%
DF Dent Small Cap Growth Institutional
NPRTX46.37-0.38
-0.81%
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Inv

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
-1.94%
FFBC - BUSE
91%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
NWBI - BUSE
90%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
UBSI - BUSE
90%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
THFF - BUSE
90%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
WSBC - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
More

MCBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCBS has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCBS jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBS
1D Price
Change %
MCBS100%
-2.78%
FFBC - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
UBSI - MCBS
85%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
BUSE - MCBS
85%
Closely correlated
-1.94%
EBC - MCBS
84%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
FMBH - MCBS
84%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
More