FMBH
Price
$48.33
Change
+$0.40 (+0.83%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.29B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MCBS
Price
$35.70
Change
+$0.10 (+0.28%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.02B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMBH vs MCBS

FMBH vs MCBS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMBH vs. MCBS commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBH is a Hold and MCBS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (FMBH: $48.33 vs. MCBS: $35.70)
Brand notoriety: FMBH and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMBH: 50% vs. MCBS: 21%
Market capitalization -- FMBH: $1.29B vs. MCBS: $1.02B
FMBH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.29B. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMBH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FMBH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCBS is a better buy in the long-term than FMBH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMBH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMBH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMBH is a better buy in the short-term than MCBS.

Price Growth

FMBH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.68% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBH($1.29B) has a higher market cap than MCBS($1.02B). MCBS has higher P/E ratio than FMBH: MCBS (12.84) vs FMBH (12.20). MCBS YTD gains are higher at: 36.867 vs. FMBH (25.383). MCBS has more cash in the bank: 279M vs. FMBH (16.1M). FMBH has less debt than MCBS: FMBH (383M) vs MCBS (440M). FMBH has higher revenues than MCBS: FMBH (355M) vs MCBS (168M).
FMBHMCBSFMBH / MCBS
Capitalization1.29B1.02B126%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.38336.86769%
P/E Ratio12.2012.8495%
Revenue355M168M211%
Total Cash16.1M279M6%
Total Debt383M440M87%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMBH vs MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
FMBH
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4543
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6629
SMR RATING
1..100
5147
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4637
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCBS's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as FMBH (94) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMBH (66) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FMBH (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FMBH (45) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FMBH (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMBHMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISCIX54.03N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Intl Small-Mid Co IS
JLVZX23.46N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Large Cap Value R2
FISGX45.91N/A
N/A
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp I
PHLQX52.14N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Health Sciences R6
GFAFX85.30-1.37
-1.58%
American Funds Growth Fd of Amer F-1

MCBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCBS has been closely correlated with FCBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCBS jumps, then FCBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBS
1D Price
Change %
MCBS100%
+0.28%
FCBC - MCBS
85%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
MBWM - MCBS
83%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
FMBH - MCBS
82%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
SRCE - MCBS
82%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
IBCP - MCBS
81%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
More