Ad is loading...
BUSE
Price
$26.47
Change
-$0.24 (-0.90%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
72 days until earnings call
SFNC
Price
$24.49
Change
-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
72 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BUSE vs SFNC

Header iconBUSE vs SFNC Comparison
Open Charts BUSE vs SFNCBanner chart's image
First Busey
Price$26.47
Change-$0.24 (-0.90%)
Volume$215.09K
CapitalizationN/A
Simmons First National
Price$24.49
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Volume$636.83K
CapitalizationN/A
BUSE vs SFNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. SFNC commentary
Nov 17, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a Sell and SFNC is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 17, 2024
Stock price -- (BUSE: $26.47 vs. SFNC: $24.49)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 76% vs. SFNC: 94%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $1.33B vs. SFNC: $2.42B
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.33B. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the long-term than SFNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the short-term than SFNC.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.15% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFNC($2.42B) has a higher market cap than BUSE($1.33B). SFNC has higher P/E ratio than BUSE: SFNC (13.98) vs BUSE (10.79). SFNC YTD gains are higher at: 27.729 vs. BUSE (10.940). SFNC has more cash in the bank: 345M vs. BUSE (142M). BUSE has less debt than SFNC: BUSE (336M) vs SFNC (1.34B). SFNC has higher revenues than BUSE: SFNC (782M) vs BUSE (442M).
BUSESFNCBUSE / SFNC
Capitalization1.33B2.42B55%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.94027.72939%
P/E Ratio10.7913.9877%
Revenue442M782M57%
Total Cash142M345M41%
Total Debt336M1.34B25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6789
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5771
SMR RATING
1..100
1612
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
256
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BUSE's Valuation (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (59) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (71) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's SMR Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (16) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (25) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSESFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JDIUX14.81-0.04
-0.27%
JHancock Disciplined Value Intl R6
FBALX29.96-0.31
-1.02%
Fidelity Balanced
GTFPX27.86-0.29
-1.03%
Goldman Sachs International Eq ESG P
ORIGX8.47-0.11
-1.28%
North Square Spectrum Alpha Fund A
BRSBX15.40-0.26
-1.66%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq B

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
-0.90%
FFBC - BUSE
91%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
NWBI - BUSE
90%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
UBSI - BUSE
90%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
TOWN - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
WSBC - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
More

SFNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFNC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFNC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFNC
1D Price
Change %
SFNC100%
-0.12%
UBSI - SFNC
89%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
SBCF - SFNC
89%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
WSBC - SFNC
89%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
WSFS - SFNC
88%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
BUSE - SFNC
88%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
More