Ad is loading...
BUYZ vs CGGO
BUYZ vs CGGO Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs CGGO
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$34.65
Change+$0.42 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.84M
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Price$28.17
Change+$0.47 (+1.70%)
Volume$844.55K
Net Assets5.15B
BUYZ vs CGGO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. CGGO commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and CGGO is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGGO has more net assets: 5.16B vs. BUYZ (6.84M). CGGO has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: CGGO (-3.593) vs BUYZ (-7.261). BUYZ was incepted earlier than CGGO: BUYZ (5 years) vs CGGO (3 years). CGGO (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than BUYZ (0.50). CGGO has a higher turnover BUYZ (12.69) vs BUYZ (12.69).
| BUYZ | CGGO | BUYZ / CGGO | |
| Gain YTD | -7.261 | -3.593 | 202% |
| Net Assets | 6.84M | 5.16B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.47 | 106% |
| Turnover | 12.69 | 31.00 | 41% |
| Yield | 0.07 | 1.14 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGGO | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.04% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| FICO - BUYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| ACVA - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| GDDY - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
More | ||||
CGGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGGO has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGGO jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO | 100% | +1.70% | ||
| BN - CGGO | 81% Closely correlated | +3.76% | ||
| ASML - CGGO | 81% Closely correlated | +2.59% | ||
| TSM - CGGO | 75% Closely correlated | +4.04% | ||
| SNPS - CGGO | 73% Closely correlated | +3.95% | ||
| SAP - CGGO | 70% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
More | ||||