Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs ERTH
BUYZ vs ERTH Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs ERTH
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$43.91
Change+$0.62 (+1.43%)
Volume$100
Net Assets8.67M
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
Price$46.76
Change+$0.78 (+1.70%)
Volume$500
Net Assets142.7M
BUYZ vs ERTH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. ERTH commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and ERTH is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERTH has more net assets: 143M vs. BUYZ (8.67M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than ERTH: BUYZ (17.295) vs ERTH (14.398). BUYZ was incepted earlier than ERTH: BUYZ (6 years) vs ERTH (19 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than ERTH (0.67). BUYZ has a higher turnover ERTH (31.00) vs ERTH (31.00).
| BUYZ | ERTH | BUYZ / ERTH | |
| Gain YTD | 17.295 | 14.398 | 120% |
| Net Assets | 8.67M | 143M | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.67 | 75% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 31.00 | 123% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.97 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | ERTH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 81% | 14 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | -0.46% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.31% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| GTM - BUYZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
| SSTK - BUYZ | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| JD - BUYZ | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.12% | ||
More | ||||
ERTH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERTH has been loosely correlated with SOL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERTH jumps, then SOL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ERTH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERTH | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| SOL - ERTH | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| MAXN - ERTH | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.03% | ||
| XPEV - ERTH | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| NIU - ERTH | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| BLNK - ERTH | 46% Loosely correlated | +7.20% | ||
More | ||||