Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs ERTH
BUYZ vs ERTH Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs ERTH
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$42.17
Change+$0.15 (+0.36%)
Volume$1.03K
Net Assets8.4M
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
Price$44.57
Change+$0.64 (+1.46%)
Volume$2.63K
Net Assets138.74M
BUYZ vs ERTH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. ERTH commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a StrongBuy and ERTH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERTH has more net assets: 139M vs. BUYZ (8.4M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than ERTH: BUYZ (14.258) vs ERTH (10.898). BUYZ was incepted earlier than ERTH: BUYZ (5 years) vs ERTH (19 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than ERTH (0.67). BUYZ has a higher turnover ERTH (31.00) vs ERTH (31.00).
| BUYZ | ERTH | BUYZ / ERTH | |
| Gain YTD | 14.258 | 10.898 | 131% |
| Net Assets | 8.4M | 139M | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.67 | 75% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 31.00 | 123% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 1.02 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | ERTH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.91% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| LIF - BUYZ | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||
ERTH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERTH has been loosely correlated with SOL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERTH jumps, then SOL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ERTH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERTH | 100% | +1.45% | ||
| SOL - ERTH | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| TPIC - ERTH | 55% Loosely correlated | -20.69% | ||
| MAXN - ERTH | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| XPEV - ERTH | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| NIU - ERTH | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
More | ||||