Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs ERTH
BUYZ vs ERTH Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs ERTH
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$42.96
Change-$0.07 (-0.16%)
Volume$866
Net Assets8.59M
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
Price$45.55
Change+$0.76 (+1.70%)
Volume$1.89K
Net Assets141.22M
BUYZ vs ERTH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. ERTH commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a StrongBuy and ERTH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERTH has more net assets: 141M vs. BUYZ (8.59M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than ERTH: BUYZ (16.378) vs ERTH (13.340). BUYZ was incepted earlier than ERTH: BUYZ (6 years) vs ERTH (19 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than ERTH (0.67). BUYZ has a higher turnover ERTH (31.00) vs ERTH (31.00).
| BUYZ | ERTH | BUYZ / ERTH | |
| Gain YTD | 16.378 | 13.340 | 123% |
| Net Assets | 8.59M | 141M | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.67 | 75% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 31.00 | 123% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.97 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | ERTH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 20 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| LIF - BUYZ | 16% Poorly correlated | +5.61% | ||
| LQDT - BUYZ | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
| MMYT - BUYZ | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
More | ||||
ERTH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERTH has been loosely correlated with SOL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERTH jumps, then SOL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ERTH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERTH | 100% | +1.70% | ||
| SOL - ERTH | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| MAXN - ERTH | 51% Loosely correlated | +8.20% | ||
| XPEV - ERTH | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| NIU - ERTH | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| BLNK - ERTH | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||