Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs ERTH
BUYZ vs ERTH Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs ERTH
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$39.99
Change+$0.34 (+0.86%)
Volume$100
Net Assets7.92M
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
Price$42.44
Change+$0.11 (+0.26%)
Volume$105
Net Assets144.48M
BUYZ vs ERTH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. ERTH commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and ERTH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERTH has more net assets: 144M vs. BUYZ (7.92M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than ERTH: BUYZ (7.435) vs ERTH (4.803). BUYZ was incepted earlier than ERTH: BUYZ (5 years) vs ERTH (19 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than ERTH (0.67). ERTH has a higher turnover BUYZ (12.69) vs BUYZ (12.69).
| BUYZ | ERTH | BUYZ / ERTH | |
| Gain YTD | 7.435 | 4.803 | 155% |
| Net Assets | 7.92M | 144M | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.67 | 75% |
| Turnover | 12.69 | 29.00 | 44% |
| Yield | 0.07 | 0.91 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ERTH | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +1.05% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +6.22% | ||
| ACVA - BUYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.54% | ||
More | ||||
ERTH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERTH has been loosely correlated with ORA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERTH jumps, then ORA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ERTH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERTH | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| ORA - ERTH | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| FSLR - ERTH | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.58% | ||
| KBH - ERTH | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| CUZ - ERTH | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| DEI - ERTH | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
More | ||||