Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FBOT
BUYZ vs FBOT Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FBOT
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$43.80
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
Volume$602
Net Assets8.75M
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF
Price$33.70
Change+$0.41 (+1.23%)
Volume$21.47K
Net Assets159.53M
BUYZ vs FBOT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FBOT commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and FBOT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBOT has more net assets: 160M vs. BUYZ (8.75M). FBOT has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FBOT (20.094) vs BUYZ (18.664). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FBOT: BUYZ (6 years) vs FBOT (5 years). BUYZ (0.50) and FBOT (0.50) have comparable expense ratios . BUYZ has a higher turnover FBOT (33.00) vs FBOT (33.00).
| BUYZ | FBOT | BUYZ / FBOT | |
| Gain YTD | 18.664 | 20.094 | 93% |
| Net Assets | 8.75M | 160M | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 100% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 33.00 | 115% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.53 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FBOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 13 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| WIX - BUYZ | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.70% | ||
| TRST - BUYZ | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.84% | ||
| FOUR - BUYZ | 14% Poorly correlated | +2.34% | ||
More | ||||
FBOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBOT has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBOT jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBOT | 100% | +1.22% | ||
| NVDA - FBOT | 72% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| CAT - FBOT | 72% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| AMZN - FBOT | 66% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| ST - FBOT | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MSFT - FBOT | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
More | ||||