10 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs TOST
BUYZ vs TOST Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs TOST
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$41.27
Change+$0.13 (+0.32%)
Volume$397
Net Assets8.22M
BUYZ vs TOST Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. TOST commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and TOST is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | TOST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SMIG | 29.82 | 0.07 | +0.24% |
| Bahl & Gaynor Sm/Md Cp Inc Gr ETF | |||
| TACK | 28.84 | 0.03 | +0.10% |
| Fairlead Tactical Sector | |||
| FTAG | 27.16 | N/A | -0.01% |
| First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | |||
| MINV | 32.93 | -0.10 | -0.29% |
| Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF | |||
| BCOR | 34.05 | -0.35 | -1.02% |
| Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF | |||
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been closely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 68% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| FOUR - BUYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
More | ||||
TOST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOST has been loosely correlated with PAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOST jumps, then PAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOST | 100% | +1.31% | ||
| PAR - TOST | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| COIN - TOST | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| CLSK - TOST | 59% Loosely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| FOUR - TOST | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| CPAY - TOST | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
More | ||||