BVFL
Price
$17.14
Change
+$0.21 (+1.24%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
118.19M
FUNC
Price
$32.95
Change
-$0.10 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
152.19M
11 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BVFL vs FUNC

Header iconBVFL vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts BVFL vs FUNCBanner chart's image
BV Financial
Price$17.14
Change+$0.21 (+1.24%)
Volume$23.37K
Capitalization118.19M
First United
Price$32.95
Change-$0.10 (-0.30%)
Volume$24.3K
Capitalization152.19M
BVFL vs FUNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BVFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BVFL vs. FUNC commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BVFL is a Hold and FUNC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BVFL: $17.14 vs. FUNC: $32.95)
Brand notoriety: BVFL and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BVFL: 45% vs. FUNC: 94%
Market capitalization -- BVFL: $118.19M vs. FUNC: $152.19M
BVFL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $118.19M. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $152.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BVFL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BVFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than BVFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BVFL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUNC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BVFL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FUNC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BVFL is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

BVFL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.66% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($152M) has a higher market cap than BVFL($118M). FUNC has higher P/E ratio than BVFL: FUNC (10.14) vs BVFL (7.07). BVFL YTD gains are higher at: -0.465 vs. FUNC (-1.599). FUNC has more cash in the bank: 86.9M vs. BVFL (3.15M). BVFL has less debt than FUNC: BVFL (37.3M) vs FUNC (112M). FUNC has higher revenues than BVFL: FUNC (71.3M) vs BVFL (37.8M).
BVFLFUNCBVFL / FUNC
Capitalization118M152M78%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.465-1.59929%
P/E Ratio7.0710.1470%
Revenue37.8M71.3M53%
Total Cash3.15M86.9M4%
Total Debt37.3M112M33%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BVFL vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
BVFL
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6164
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10027
SMR RATING
1..100
5944
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1321
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BVFL (73) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BVFL (100) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew significantly faster than BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BVFL (59) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BVFL (44) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

BVFL's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (21) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BVFL’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BVFLFUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
43%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BVFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OMSOX27.440.25
+0.92%
Invesco Main Street All Cap A
AOTIX28.530.25
+0.88%
Virtus EM Opps Instl
FSKGX18.970.16
+0.85%
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6
BILSX9.670.06
+0.62%
BlackRock U.S. Insights Lon/Shr Eq Ins
MKVBX13.210.08
+0.61%
MFS International Large Cap Value A

BVFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BVFL has been loosely correlated with FBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BVFL jumps, then FBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVFL
1D Price
Change %
BVFL100%
+1.24%
FBK - BVFL
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
MRBK - BVFL
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
CWBC - BVFL
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
FUNC - BVFL
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
STBA - BVFL
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
More