It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BVNKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBXBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BVNKF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBXBF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
BVNKF (@Biotechnology) experienced а -1.16% price change this week, while MBXBF (@Biotechnology) price change was +1.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -7.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.25%.
Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
BVNKF | MBXBF | BVNKF / MBXBF | |
Capitalization | 2.2B | 35.9M | 6,125% |
EBITDA | 1.27B | 7.52M | 16,842% |
Gain YTD | 5.933 | -11.165 | -53% |
P/E Ratio | 13.46 | 9.72 | 138% |
Revenue | 6.07B | 23.4M | 25,940% |
Total Cash | 1.87B | 12.8M | 14,617% |
Total Debt | 114M | 6.36M | 1,793% |
BVNKF | MBXBF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 2 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BVNKF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as MBXBF (75). This means that BVNKF’s stock grew similarly to MBXBF’s over the last 12 months.
MBXBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as BVNKF (90). This means that MBXBF’s stock grew similarly to BVNKF’s over the last 12 months.
MBXBF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as BVNKF (64). This means that MBXBF’s stock grew similarly to BVNKF’s over the last 12 months.
MBXBF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as BVNKF (60). This means that MBXBF’s stock grew similarly to BVNKF’s over the last 12 months.
BVNKF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MBXBF (92). This means that BVNKF’s stock grew significantly faster than MBXBF’s over the last 12 months.
BVNKF | MBXBF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago65% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago58% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago61% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago64% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago67% | 2 days ago59% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago60% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago30% | 2 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago74% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BVNKF and LABFF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BVNKF and LABFF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BVNKF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BVNKF | 100% | N/A | ||
LABFF - BVNKF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SILO - BVNKF | 22% Poorly correlated | +10.31% | ||
GOVX - BVNKF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
MBXBF - BVNKF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.49% | ||
IMRN - BVNKF | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.38% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MBXBF and CRMD have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBXBF and CRMD's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBXBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MBXBF | 100% | +2.49% | ||
CRMD - MBXBF | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.77% | ||
TECX - MBXBF | 23% Poorly correlated | +6.76% | ||
BVNKF - MBXBF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
NBY - MBXBF | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.86% | ||
MMIRF - MBXBF | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |