Ad is loading...
BWA
Price
$34.50
Change
+$0.07 (+0.20%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
81 days until earnings call
GTX
Price
$7.85
Change
+$0.05 (+0.64%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
86 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BWA vs GTX

Header iconBWA vs GTX Comparison
Open Charts BWA vs GTXBanner chart's image
BorgWarner
Price$34.50
Change+$0.07 (+0.20%)
Volume$1.76M
CapitalizationN/A
Garrett Motion
Price$7.85
Change+$0.05 (+0.64%)
Volume$769.74K
CapitalizationN/A
BWA vs GTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
BWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWA vs. GTX commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWA is a Sell and GTX is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BWA: $34.50 vs. GTX: $7.85)
Brand notoriety: BWA and GTX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWA: 75% vs. GTX: 93%
Market capitalization -- BWA: $8.09B vs. GTX: $2.37B
BWA [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $8.09B. GTX’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GTX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTX is a better buy in the long-term than BWA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GTX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWA is a better buy in the short-term than GTX.

Price Growth

BWA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +1.71% price change this week, while GTX (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWA is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

GTX is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-2.58% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWA($8.09B) has a higher market cap than GTX($2.37B). BWA has higher P/E ratio than GTX: BWA (12.98) vs GTX (10.19). BWA YTD gains are higher at: -2.808 vs. GTX (-18.821). BWA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.65B vs. GTX (600M). BWA has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. GTX (259M). GTX has less debt than BWA: GTX (1.69B) vs BWA (3.93B). BWA has higher revenues than GTX: BWA (14.2B) vs GTX (3.89B).
BWAGTXBWA / GTX
Capitalization8.09B2.37B342%
EBITDA1.65B600M274%
Gain YTD-2.808-18.82115%
P/E Ratio12.9810.19127%
Revenue14.2B3.89B365%
Total Cash1.53B259M592%
Total Debt3.93B1.69B232%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWA vs GTX: Fundamental Ratings
BWA
GTX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2418
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83100
SMR RATING
1..100
56100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5559
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6018
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWA's Valuation (38) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GTX (45) in the null industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GTX (100) in the null industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's SMR Rating (56) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTX (100) in the null industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTX’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GTX (59) in the null industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWA (60) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWAGTX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSR95.210.38
+0.40%
Invesco Active US Real Estate
FLGV20.270.02
+0.09%
Franklin U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
XMPT22.34-0.08
-0.36%
VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF
INDA53.02-0.38
-0.71%
iShares MSCI India ETF
MEDI25.20-0.55
-2.14%
Harbor Health Care ETF

BWA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWA has been closely correlated with VC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWA jumps, then VC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWA
1D Price
Change %
BWA100%
+0.20%
VC - BWA
74%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
GNTX - BWA
72%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
LEA - BWA
70%
Closely correlated
-0.47%
DAN - BWA
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.52%
MGA - BWA
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
More