BWAGF
Price
$126.28
Change
+$1.93 (+1.55%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
4.01B
CBCY
Price
$925.00
Change
-$10.00 (-1.07%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.78B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWAGF vs CBCY

Header iconBWAGF vs CBCY Comparison
Open Charts BWAGF vs CBCYBanner chart's image
BAWAG Group AG
Price$126.28
Change+$1.93 (+1.55%)
Volume$225
Capitalization4.01B
Central Ban
Price$925.00
Change-$10.00 (-1.07%)
Volume$260
Capitalization2.78B
BWAGF vs CBCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWAGF vs. CBCY commentary
Jul 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWAGF is a StrongBuy and CBCY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 16, 2025
Stock price -- (BWAGF: $126.28 vs. CBCY: $925.00)
Brand notoriety: BWAGF and CBCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWAGF: 73% vs. CBCY: 1156%
Market capitalization -- BWAGF: $4.01B vs. CBCY: $2.78B
BWAGF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.01B. CBCY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWAGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCBCY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWAGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CBCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BWAGF and CBCY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWAGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CBCY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWAGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CBCY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWAGF is a better buy in the short-term than CBCY.

Price Growth

BWAGF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CBCY (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWAGF($4.01B) has a higher market cap than CBCY($2.78B). BWAGF YTD gains are higher at: 48.038 vs. CBCY (44.386).
BWAGFCBCYBWAGF / CBCY
Capitalization4.01B2.78B144%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD48.03844.386108%
P/E Ratio9.37N/A-
Revenue1.38BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10.4BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWAGF vs CBCY: Fundamental Ratings
BWAGF
CBCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4962
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
512
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWAGF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CBCY (50). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew similarly to CBCY’s over the last 12 months.

BWAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as CBCY (12). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew similarly to CBCY’s over the last 12 months.

BWAGF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CBCY (100). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew similarly to CBCY’s over the last 12 months.

BWAGF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CBCY (43). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew similarly to CBCY’s over the last 12 months.

BWAGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CBCY (100). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew similarly to CBCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWAGFCBCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALLIX116.78N/A
N/A
AB Large Cap Growth I
WFDAX26.09N/A
N/A
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl A
MDSKX24.79N/A
N/A
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Idx Inv A
PAGDX122.92N/A
N/A
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth A
VIOPX16.80N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I International Opps

BWAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BWAGF and TVLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BWAGF and TVLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWAGF
1D Price
Change %
BWAGF100%
N/A
TVLF - BWAGF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.41%
SVVB - BWAGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBF - BWAGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBY - BWAGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.21%
PMHG - BWAGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CBCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBCY and FGFI have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBCY and FGFI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBCY
1D Price
Change %
CBCY100%
-1.07%
FGFI - CBCY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBBI - CBCY
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
CBGPY - CBCY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBAF - CBCY
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
BWAGF - CBCY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More