BWAGF
Price
$124.66
Change
+$3.86 (+3.20%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
4.01B
CRZBY
Price
$30.67
Change
+$0.09 (+0.29%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.01B
63 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWAGF vs CRZBY

Header iconBWAGF vs CRZBY Comparison
Open Charts BWAGF vs CRZBYBanner chart's image
BAWAG Group AG
Price$124.66
Change+$3.86 (+3.20%)
Volume$165
Capitalization4.01B
Commerzbank AG
Price$30.67
Change+$0.09 (+0.29%)
Volume$15.48K
Capitalization15.01B
BWAGF vs CRZBY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CRZBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWAGF vs. CRZBY commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWAGF is a Hold and CRZBY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BWAGF: $124.66 vs. CRZBY: $30.67)
Brand notoriety: BWAGF and CRZBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWAGF: 48% vs. CRZBY: 30%
Market capitalization -- BWAGF: $4.01B vs. CRZBY: $15.01B
BWAGF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.01B. CRZBY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $15.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWAGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCRZBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWAGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CRZBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRZBY is a better buy in the long-term than BWAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRZBY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CRZBY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BWAGF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.20% price change this week, while CRZBY (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRZBY is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRZBY($15B) has a higher market cap than BWAGF($4.01B). BWAGF (9.37) and CRZBY (8.95) have similar P/E ratio . CRZBY YTD gains are higher at: 94.458 vs. BWAGF (46.146). CRZBY has higher revenues than BWAGF: CRZBY (10.3B) vs BWAGF (1.38B).
BWAGFCRZBYBWAGF / CRZBY
Capitalization4.01B15B27%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD46.14694.45849%
P/E Ratio9.378.95105%
Revenue1.38B10.3B13%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10.4BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWAGF vs CRZBY: Fundamental Ratings
BWAGF
CRZBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5030
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
52
SMR RATING
1..100
84
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1416
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRZBY's Valuation (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWAGF (90). This means that CRZBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWAGF’s over the last 12 months.

CRZBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as BWAGF (5). This means that CRZBY’s stock grew similarly to BWAGF’s over the last 12 months.

CRZBY's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BWAGF (8). This means that CRZBY’s stock grew similarly to BWAGF’s over the last 12 months.

CRZBY's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BWAGF (36). This means that CRZBY’s stock grew similarly to BWAGF’s over the last 12 months.

BWAGF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as CRZBY (16). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew similarly to CRZBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRZBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRZBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MBACX30.310.07
+0.23%
NYLI Balanced Class C
INDEX55.97N/A
N/A
ONEFUND S&P 500®
WFALX20.46N/A
N/A
Allspring Index Asset Allocation C
ANOYX22.58N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Growth Y
GEMNX25.46N/A
N/A
GMO Emerging Markets R6

BWAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BWAGF and TVLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BWAGF and TVLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWAGF
1D Price
Change %
BWAGF100%
N/A
TVLF - BWAGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVVB - BWAGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBF - BWAGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBY - BWAGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
PMHG - BWAGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CRZBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRZBY has been loosely correlated with ISNPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRZBY jumps, then ISNPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRZBY
1D Price
Change %
CRZBY100%
+0.29%
ISNPY - CRZBY
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
UNCRY - CRZBY
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
SCGLY - CRZBY
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
DB - CRZBY
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
CRARY - CRZBY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
More