BWAGF
Price
$128.10
Change
-$2.42 (-1.85%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
9.99B
SVVB
Price
$17.87
Change
-$0.11 (-0.61%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
62.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWAGF vs SVVB

Header iconBWAGF vs SVVB Comparison
Open Charts BWAGF vs SVVBBanner chart's image
BAWAG Group AG
Price$128.10
Change-$2.42 (-1.85%)
Volume$134
Capitalization9.99B
Savi Financial
Price$17.87
Change-$0.11 (-0.61%)
Volume$400
Capitalization62.12M
BWAGF vs SVVB Comparison Chart in %
BWAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVVB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWAGF vs. SVVB commentary
Oct 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWAGF is a Hold and SVVB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BWAGF: $128.10 vs. SVVB: $17.87)
Brand notoriety: BWAGF and SVVB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWAGF: 29% vs. SVVB: 34%
Market capitalization -- BWAGF: $9.99B vs. SVVB: $62.12M
BWAGF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $9.99B. SVVB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $62.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWAGF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSVVB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BWAGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SVVB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWAGF is a better buy in the long-term than SVVB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWAGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVVB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWAGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SVVB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWAGF is a better buy in the short-term than SVVB.

Price Growth

BWAGF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.86% price change this week, while SVVB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWAGF($9.99B) has a higher market cap than SVVB($62.1M). SVVB has higher P/E ratio than BWAGF: SVVB (14.10) vs BWAGF (11.09). BWAGF YTD gains are higher at: 50.176 vs. SVVB (18.344).
BWAGFSVVBBWAGF / SVVB
Capitalization9.99B62.1M16,092%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD50.17618.344274%
P/E Ratio11.0914.1079%
Revenue1.98BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt17.8BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWAGF vs SVVB: Fundamental Ratings
BWAGF
SVVB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
631
SMR RATING
1..100
116
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1844
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWAGF's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as SVVB (70). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew similarly to SVVB’s over the last 12 months.

BWAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as SVVB (31). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew similarly to SVVB’s over the last 12 months.

SVVB's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as BWAGF (11). This means that SVVB’s stock grew similarly to BWAGF’s over the last 12 months.

BWAGF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SVVB (49). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew similarly to SVVB’s over the last 12 months.

BWAGF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as SVVB (44). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew similarly to SVVB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWAGFSVVB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
16%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVVB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBAT29.370.41
+1.42%
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
GVUS52.650.25
+0.48%
Goldman Sachs MktBt Russell LgCpValEqETF
STEW18.100.05
+0.26%
SRH Total Return Fund
SEPT34.500.01
+0.04%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer10 Sep ETF
PMMY25.85N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May

BWAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BWAGF and TVLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BWAGF and TVLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWAGF
1D Price
Change %
BWAGF100%
-1.86%
TVLF - BWAGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVVB - BWAGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBF - BWAGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBY - BWAGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
PMHG - BWAGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
More

SVVB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVVB and PFBN have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVVB and PFBN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVVB
1D Price
Change %
SVVB100%
N/A
PFBN - SVVB
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
BWAGF - SVVB
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
WSSH - SVVB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMBL - SVVB
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
CNBN - SVVB
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
More