BWAGF
Price
$78.55
Change
+$1.92 (+2.51%)
Updated
Dec 4 closing price
TVLF
Price
$7.11
Change
-$0.24 (-3.27%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

BWAGF vs TVLF

Header iconBWAGF vs TVLF Comparison
Open Charts BWAGF vs TVLFBanner chart's image
BAWAG Group AG
Price$78.55
Change+$1.92 (+2.51%)
Volume$114
CapitalizationN/A
Tennessee Valley Financial Holdings
Price$7.11
Change-$0.24 (-3.27%)
Volume$863
CapitalizationN/A
BWAGF vs TVLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BWAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWAGF vs. TVLF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWAGF is a Hold and TVLF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BWAGF: $78.55 vs. TVLF: $7.35)
Brand notoriety: BWAGF and TVLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWAGF: 24% vs. TVLF: 40%
Market capitalization -- BWAGF: $4.01B vs. TVLF: $0
BWAGF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.01B. TVLF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWAGF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTVLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BWAGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TVLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TVLF is a better buy in the long-term than BWAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWAGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TVLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWAGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TVLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TVLF is a better buy in the short-term than BWAGF.

Price Growth

BWAGF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TVLF (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWAGF YTD gains are higher at: 40.947 vs. TVLF (15.278).
BWAGFTVLFBWAGF / TVLF
Capitalization4.01BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD40.94715.278268%
P/E Ratio9.37N/A-
Revenue1.38BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10.4BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWAGF vs TVLF: Fundamental Ratings
BWAGF
TVLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2685
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2228
SMR RATING
1..100
1051
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2838
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3049

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TVLF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWAGF (77). This means that TVLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWAGF’s over the last 12 months.

BWAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as TVLF (28). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew similarly to TVLF’s over the last 12 months.

BWAGF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TVLF (51). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TVLF’s over the last 12 months.

TVLF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BWAGF (45). This means that TVLF’s stock grew similarly to BWAGF’s over the last 12 months.

BWAGF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as TVLF (38). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew similarly to TVLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWAGFTVLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BWAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSTFX14.02N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Capital Growth C
FASMX20.96-0.37
-1.73%
Fidelity Asset Manager 50%
DHFYX12.74-0.31
-2.38%
Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated Y
LAVTX15.03-0.41
-2.66%
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R5
BHCHX19.34-0.55
-2.77%
Baron Health Care Instl

BWAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BWAGF and TVLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BWAGF and TVLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWAGF
1D Price
Change %
BWAGF100%
N/A
TVLF - BWAGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVVB - BWAGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBF - BWAGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBY - BWAGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
PMHG - BWAGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
More

TVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TVLF and BWAGF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TVLF and BWAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TVLF
1D Price
Change %
TVLF100%
-3.27%
BWAGF - TVLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTUY - TVLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TYCB - TVLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
IBWC - TVLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMAK - TVLF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More