BWB
Price
$15.96
Change
-$0.28 (-1.72%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
438.62M
69 days until earnings call
CNOB
Price
$24.38
Change
-$0.19 (-0.77%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.23B
69 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWB vs CNOB

Header iconBWB vs CNOB Comparison
Open Charts BWB vs CNOBBanner chart's image
Bridgewater Bancshares
Price$15.96
Change-$0.28 (-1.72%)
Volume$75.12K
Capitalization438.62M
ConnectOne Ban
Price$24.38
Change-$0.19 (-0.77%)
Volume$230.44K
Capitalization1.23B
BWB vs CNOB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWB vs. CNOB commentary
Aug 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWB is a Hold and CNOB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BWB: $15.96 vs. CNOB: $24.38)
Brand notoriety: BWB and CNOB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWB: 104% vs. CNOB: 71%
Market capitalization -- BWB: $438.62M vs. CNOB: $1.23B
BWB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $438.62M. CNOB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCNOB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BWB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CNOB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BWB and CNOB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNOB’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CNOB’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNOB is a better buy in the short-term than BWB.

Price Growth

BWB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.37% price change this week, while CNOB (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWB is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

CNOB is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.71% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNOB($1.23B) has a higher market cap than BWB($439M). CNOB has higher P/E ratio than BWB: CNOB (29.73) vs BWB (13.19). BWB YTD gains are higher at: 18.135 vs. CNOB (7.928). BWB has less debt than CNOB: BWB (527M) vs CNOB (708M). CNOB has higher revenues than BWB: CNOB (270M) vs BWB (123M).
BWBCNOBBWB / CNOB
Capitalization439M1.23B36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.1357.928229%
P/E Ratio13.1929.7344%
Revenue123M270M46%
Total CashN/A57.8M-
Total Debt527M708M74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWB vs CNOB: Fundamental Ratings
BWB
CNOB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
85
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6159
SMR RATING
1..100
4228
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
386
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWB's Valuation (80) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (82). This means that BWB’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BWB (61). This means that CNOB’s stock grew similarly to BWB’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's SMR Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BWB (42). This means that CNOB’s stock grew similarly to BWB’s over the last 12 months.

BWB's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (58). This means that BWB’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BWB (38). This means that CNOB’s stock grew similarly to BWB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWBCNOB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DNLDX64.28N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Active MidCap A
BMDSX20.91N/A
N/A
Baird Mid Cap Growth Investor
TICIX33.57N/A
N/A
Timothy Plan Israel Common Values I
FIQCX29.80N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Z
RPNRX13.75N/A
N/A
RiverPark/Next Century Lg Gr Retl

CNOB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNOB has been closely correlated with BHLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNOB jumps, then BHLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNOB
1D Price
Change %
CNOB100%
-0.77%
BHLB - CNOB
88%
Closely correlated
-1.12%
STBA - CNOB
87%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
WSFS - CNOB
86%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
FCF - CNOB
86%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
UBSI - CNOB
86%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
More