BWB
Price
$16.20
Change
+$0.29 (+1.82%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
322.83M
28 days until earnings call
SFNC
Price
$19.02
Change
+$0.36 (+1.93%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.42B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWB vs SFNC

Header iconBWB vs SFNC Comparison
Open Charts BWB vs SFNCBanner chart's image
Bridgewater Bancshares
Price$16.20
Change+$0.29 (+1.82%)
Volume$1.86K
Capitalization322.83M
Simmons First National
Price$19.02
Change+$0.36 (+1.93%)
Volume$70.09K
Capitalization2.42B
BWB vs SFNC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWB vs. SFNC commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWB is a StrongBuy and SFNC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BWB: $16.19 vs. SFNC: $19.03)
Brand notoriety: BWB and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWB: 65% vs. SFNC: 153%
Market capitalization -- BWB: $322.83M vs. SFNC: $2.42B
BWB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $322.83M. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BWB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BWB and SFNC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWB is a better buy in the short-term than SFNC.

Price Growth

BWB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +8.22% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWB is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFNC($2.42B) has a higher market cap than BWB($323M). SFNC has higher P/E ratio than BWB: SFNC (13.98) vs BWB (9.17). BWB YTD gains are higher at: 19.837 vs. SFNC (-12.309). BWB has less debt than SFNC: BWB (413M) vs SFNC (1.34B). SFNC has higher revenues than BWB: SFNC (782M) vs BWB (110M).
BWBSFNCBWB / SFNC
Capitalization323M2.42B13%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.837-12.309-161%
P/E Ratio9.1713.9866%
Revenue110M782M14%
Total CashN/A345M-
Total Debt413M1.34B31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWB vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
BWB
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1710
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6473
SMR RATING
1..100
3312
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1523
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFNC's Valuation (24) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWB (71) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWB’s over the last 12 months.

BWB's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (73) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BWB’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's SMR Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BWB (33) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to BWB’s over the last 12 months.

BWB's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (59) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BWB’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

BWB's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (23) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BWB’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWBSFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMCQX13.42N/A
N/A
GMO US Equity VI
PQNCX17.32N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value C
RYUIX61.49N/A
N/A
Rydex Utilities Inv
BVALX14.33N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory BeutelGoodmanLg-CpValInst
JHUJX33.59N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity R2

BWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWB has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWB jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWB
1D Price
Change %
BWB100%
+1.76%
THFF - BWB
81%
Closely correlated
+3.41%
BUSE - BWB
80%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
CNOB - BWB
80%
Closely correlated
+2.53%
HBNC - BWB
79%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
SFNC - BWB
79%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
More

SFNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFNC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFNC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFNC
1D Price
Change %
SFNC100%
+1.98%
UBSI - SFNC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.88%
HOPE - SFNC
91%
Closely correlated
+3.14%
UCB - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
HWC - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
+2.74%
FFBC - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.99%
More