BWFG
Price
$37.39
Change
+$0.47 (+1.27%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
200.1M
2 days until earnings call
EQFN
Price
$13.05
Change
+$0.06 (+0.46%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
31.19M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWFG vs EQFN

Header iconBWFG vs EQFN Comparison
Open Charts BWFG vs EQFNBanner chart's image
Bankwell Financial Group
Price$37.39
Change+$0.47 (+1.27%)
Volume$27.58K
Capitalization200.1M
Equitable Financial
Price$13.05
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
Volume$1.62K
Capitalization31.19M
BWFG vs EQFN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EQFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWFG vs. EQFN commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWFG is a Hold and EQFN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BWFG: $37.39 vs. EQFN: $13.05)
Brand notoriety: BWFG and EQFN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWFG: 138% vs. EQFN: 93%
Market capitalization -- BWFG: $200.1M vs. EQFN: $31.19M
BWFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $200.1M. EQFN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $31.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEQFN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BWFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EQFN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWFG is a better buy in the long-term than EQFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EQFN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EQFN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWFG is a better buy in the short-term than EQFN.

Price Growth

BWFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.29% price change this week, while EQFN (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

EQFN is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.50% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWFG($200M) has a higher market cap than EQFN($31.2M). EQFN has higher P/E ratio than BWFG: EQFN (6.94) vs BWFG (5.40). BWFG YTD gains are higher at: 21.500 vs. EQFN (2.353). EQFN has less debt than BWFG: EQFN (12.6M) vs BWFG (159M). BWFG has higher revenues than EQFN: BWFG (99.3M) vs EQFN (19.3M).
BWFGEQFNBWFG / EQFN
Capitalization200M31.2M641%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.5002.353914%
P/E Ratio5.406.9478%
Revenue99.3M19.3M515%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt159M12.6M1,262%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWFG vs EQFN: Fundamental Ratings
BWFG
EQFN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8032
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2225
SMR RATING
1..100
4261
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4454
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
348
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EQFN's Valuation (23) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWFG (66). This means that EQFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWFG’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EQFN (25). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to EQFN’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's SMR Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EQFN (61). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to EQFN’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EQFN (54). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to EQFN’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQFN (48). This means that BWFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWFGEQFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EQFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVNLF12.560.20
+1.62%
Svenska Handelsbanken AB PUBL
IHICF99.57N/A
N/A
IHI Corp
TRUHF0.13N/A
N/A
Truly International Holdings Ltd.
RBRI0.02N/A
N/A
RBR Global Inc.
BADEF0.64-0.02
-2.76%
HERCULES METALS CORP.

EQFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQFN has been loosely correlated with SFGIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EQFN jumps, then SFGIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQFN
1D Price
Change %
EQFN100%
N/A
SFGIF - EQFN
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FCPB - EQFN
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
FNWB - EQFN
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.01%
BWFG - EQFN
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
FMBH - EQFN
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
More