BWFG
Price
$34.97
Change
-$0.03 (-0.09%)
Updated
May 13, 12:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
200.1M
71 days until earnings call
GBFH
Price
$39.27
Change
-$0.18 (-0.46%)
Updated
May 13, 12:36 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
158.76M
66 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BWFG vs GBFH

Header iconBWFG vs GBFH Comparison
Open Charts BWFG vs GBFHBanner chart's image
Bankwell Financial Group
Price$34.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
Volume$100
Capitalization200.1M
Gbank Financial Holdings
Price$39.27
Change-$0.18 (-0.46%)
Volume$100
Capitalization158.76M
BWFG vs GBFH Comparison Chart
Loading...
BWFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWFG vs. GBFH commentary
May 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWFG is a Buy and GBFH is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 13, 2025
Stock price -- (BWFG: $35.00 vs. GBFH: $39.46)
Brand notoriety: BWFG and GBFH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWFG: 157% vs. GBFH: 251%
Market capitalization -- BWFG: $200.1M vs. GBFH: $158.76M
BWFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $200.1M. GBFH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $158.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGBFH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BWFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GBFH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWFG is a better buy in the long-term than GBFH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBFH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GBFH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWFG is a better buy in the short-term than GBFH.

Price Growth

BWFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.21% price change this week, while GBFH (@Regional Banks) price change was -9.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

GBFH is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.55% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWFG($200M) has a higher market cap than GBFH($159M). GBFH has higher P/E ratio than BWFG: GBFH (14.20) vs BWFG (5.40). BWFG YTD gains are higher at: 13.733 vs. GBFH (-8.233). GBFH has less debt than BWFG: GBFH (26M) vs BWFG (159M). BWFG has higher revenues than GBFH: BWFG (99.3M) vs GBFH (45.4M).
BWFGGBFHBWFG / GBFH
Capitalization200M159M126%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.733-8.233-167%
P/E Ratio5.4014.2038%
Revenue99.3M45.4M219%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt159M26M612%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWFG: Fundamental Ratings
BWFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWFGGBFH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BWFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMALX26.500.06
+0.23%
Crawford Multi-Asset Income
HRCIX56.80N/A
N/A
Carillon ClariVest Capital Apprec I
RBCIX9.50N/A
N/A
RBC China Equity I
AMIGX75.04N/A
N/A
Amana Growth Institutional
HNLVX21.31N/A
N/A
Harbor Large Cap Value Retirement

BWFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWFG has been closely correlated with HTB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWFG jumps, then HTB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWFG
1D Price
Change %
BWFG100%
+2.43%
HTB - BWFG
74%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
CAC - BWFG
73%
Closely correlated
+2.73%
IBOC - BWFG
73%
Closely correlated
+3.12%
BY - BWFG
72%
Closely correlated
+2.71%
UCB - BWFG
72%
Closely correlated
+4.31%
More

GBFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBFH has been loosely correlated with RF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBFH jumps, then RF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBFH
1D Price
Change %
GBFH100%
+0.54%
RF - GBFH
36%
Loosely correlated
+5.15%
EWBC - GBFH
35%
Loosely correlated
+6.58%
BCAL - GBFH
34%
Loosely correlated
+5.28%
BVFL - GBFH
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
BWFG - GBFH
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.43%
More