BWFG
Price
$44.85
Change
+$0.95 (+2.16%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
353.3M
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HOPE
Price
$10.35
Change
+$0.38 (+3.81%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.33B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWFG vs HOPE

Header iconBWFG vs HOPE Comparison
Open Charts BWFG vs HOPEBanner chart's image
Bankwell Financial Group
Price$44.85
Change+$0.95 (+2.16%)
Volume$29.43K
Capitalization353.3M
Hope Ban
Price$10.35
Change+$0.38 (+3.81%)
Volume$853.24K
Capitalization1.33B
BWFG vs HOPE Comparison Chart in %
BWFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HOPE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWFG vs. HOPE commentary
Nov 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWFG is a Hold and HOPE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BWFG: $44.85 vs. HOPE: $10.35)
Brand notoriety: BWFG and HOPE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWFG: 106% vs. HOPE: 111%
Market capitalization -- BWFG: $353.3M vs. HOPE: $1.33B
BWFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $353.3M. HOPE’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHOPE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BWFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HOPE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWFG is a better buy in the long-term than HOPE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOPE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HOPE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWFG is a better buy in the short-term than HOPE.

Price Growth

BWFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.73% price change this week, while HOPE (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

HOPE is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOPE($1.33B) has a higher market cap than BWFG($353M). HOPE has higher P/E ratio than BWFG: HOPE (26.55) vs BWFG (12.25). BWFG YTD gains are higher at: 47.149 vs. HOPE (-11.161). BWFG has less debt than HOPE: BWFG (145M) vs HOPE (201M). HOPE has higher revenues than BWFG: HOPE (470M) vs BWFG (99.2M).
BWFGHOPEBWFG / HOPE
Capitalization353M1.33B27%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD47.149-11.161-422%
P/E Ratio12.2526.5546%
Revenue99.2M470M21%
Total CashN/A253M-
Total Debt145M201M72%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWFG vs HOPE: Fundamental Ratings
BWFG
HOPE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2472
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1565
SMR RATING
1..100
4319
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
769
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a24

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWFG's Valuation (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOPE (81) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to HOPE’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HOPE (65) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BWFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HOPE’s over the last 12 months.

HOPE's SMR Rating (19) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BWFG (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HOPE’s stock grew similarly to BWFG’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOPE (59) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to HOPE’s over the last 12 months.

HOPE's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BWFG (76) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HOPE’s stock grew significantly faster than BWFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWFGHOPE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HOPE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DILCX14.510.18
+1.26%
Davis International C
BRXBX16.660.14
+0.85%
MFS Blended Research Intl Eq B
FFCMX22.150.14
+0.64%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% C
MDODX10.700.04
+0.38%
Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity R6
MLCPX8.230.02
+0.24%
MainGate MLP C

BWFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWFG has been closely correlated with TMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWFG jumps, then TMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWFG
1D Price
Change %
BWFG100%
+2.16%
TMP - BWFG
76%
Closely correlated
+3.68%
TCBK - BWFG
74%
Closely correlated
+3.46%
ONB - BWFG
74%
Closely correlated
+4.20%
FBNC - BWFG
74%
Closely correlated
+2.84%
ABCB - BWFG
73%
Closely correlated
+3.39%
More