Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BWLAX vs RMFCX
BWLAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BWLAX vs RMFCX
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value A
Price$25.31
Change-$0.18 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.31M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.89
Change-$0.48 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.34B
BWLAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BWLAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. BWLAX (226M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BWLAX: RMFCX (1.24) vs BWLAX (0.85). BWLAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BWLAX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BWLAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BWLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BWLAX: RMFCX (250) vs BWLAX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.02 vs. BWLAX (-2.78). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 62.19 vs. BWLAX (28.04).
| BWLAX | RMFCX | BWLAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.991 | 12.543 | 104% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 226M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.24 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.78 | 6.02 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.07 | 40.53 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.04 | 62.19 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.97 | 103.10 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement