Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BWLAX vs RMFCX
BWLAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BWLAX vs RMFCX
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value A
Price$26.14
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.39M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
BWLAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BWLAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. BWLAX (225M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BWLAX: RMFCX (1.21) vs BWLAX (0.82). BWLAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BWLAX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BWLAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BWLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BWLAX: RMFCX (250) vs BWLAX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. BWLAX (-3.27). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. BWLAX (17.96).
| BWLAX | RMFCX | BWLAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.696 | 12.783 | 131% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 225M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.21 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.27 | 6.00 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.01 | 27.94 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.96 | 52.67 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.14 | 84.73 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement