Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BWLCX vs RMFCX
BWLCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BWLCX vs RMFCX
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value C
Price$24.27
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.57M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.32
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.09B
BWLCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BWLCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. BWLCX (227M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BWLCX: RMFCX (1.24) vs BWLCX (0.00). BWLCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BWLCX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BWLCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BWLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BWLCX: RMFCX (250) vs BWLCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. BWLCX (-3.89). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.20 vs. BWLCX (22.59).
| BWLCX | RMFCX | BWLCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.91 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.91 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.590 | 13.245 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 227M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.89 | 6.41 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.20 | 42.10 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.59 | 63.20 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.10 | 103.62 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement