Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BWLCX vs RMFCX
BWLCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BWLCX vs RMFCX
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value C
Price$24.74
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.39M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
BWLCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BWLCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. BWLCX (225M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BWLCX: RMFCX (1.21) vs BWLCX (0.00). BWLCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BWLCX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BWLCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BWLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BWLCX: RMFCX (250) vs BWLCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. BWLCX (-4.66). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. BWLCX (11.75).
| BWLCX | RMFCX | BWLCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.91 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.91 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.933 | 12.783 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 225M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.66 | 6.00 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.33 | 27.94 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.75 | 52.67 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.77 | 84.73 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers