Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BWLCX vs RMFCX
BWLCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BWLCX vs RMFCX
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value C
Price$24.55
Change+$0.24 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.08M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.01
Change+$0.50 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
BWLCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BWLCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. BWLCX (225M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BWLCX: RMFCX (1.20) vs BWLCX (0.00). BWLCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BWLCX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BWLCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BWLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BWLCX: RMFCX (250) vs BWLCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.54 vs. BWLCX (-6.10). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.04 vs. BWLCX (18.43).
| BWLCX | RMFCX | BWLCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.91 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.91 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.918 | 14.613 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 225M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.10 | 5.54 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.32 | 39.44 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.43 | 61.04 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.65 | 88.77 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers