Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BWLCX vs RMFEX
BWLCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts BWLCX vs RMFEX
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value C
Price$23.92
Change-$0.06 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.68M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.85
Change+$0.06 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
BWLCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BWLCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. BWLCX (229M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than BWLCX: RMFEX (1.49) vs BWLCX (0.00). BWLCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: BWLCX (14 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). BWLCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). BWLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than BWLCX: RMFEX (250) vs BWLCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.06 vs. BWLCX (-0.83). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.84 vs. BWLCX (16.90).
| BWLCX | RMFEX | BWLCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.62 | 313% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.62 | 313% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.090 | 11.638 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.83 | 8.06 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.56 | 33.39 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.90 | 58.84 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.74 | 98.59 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement