BWLKF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
4.07M
CIOXY
Price
$0.84
Change
-$0.01 (-1.18%)
Updated
Sep 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.82B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWLKF vs CIOXY

Header iconBWLKF vs CIOXY Comparison
Open Charts BWLKF vs CIOXYBanner chart's image
Boardwalktech Software
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$44K
Capitalization4.07M
Cielo SA
Price$0.84
Change-$0.01 (-1.18%)
Volume$59.12K
Capitalization2.82B
BWLKF vs CIOXY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWLKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWLKF vs. CIOXY commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLKF is a Hold and CIOXY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BWLKF: $0.06 vs. CIOXY: $0.84)
Brand notoriety: BWLKF and CIOXY are both not notable
BWLKF represents the Packaged Software, while CIOXY is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWLKF: 67% vs. CIOXY: 100%
Market capitalization -- BWLKF: $4.07M vs. CIOXY: $2.82B
BWLKF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $4.07M. CIOXY’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $2.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $320.41B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.79T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.09B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWLKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCIOXY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWLKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CIOXY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIOXY is a better buy in the long-term than BWLKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWLKF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BWLKF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BWLKF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CIOXY (@Computer Communications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.38%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.48% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (-0.71% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIOXY($2.82B) has a higher market cap than BWLKF($4.07M). CIOXY YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. BWLKF (-16.667). CIOXY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.13B vs. BWLKF (-2.16M). CIOXY has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. BWLKF (195K). BWLKF has less debt than CIOXY: BWLKF (3.39M) vs CIOXY (3.61B). CIOXY has higher revenues than BWLKF: CIOXY (10.4B) vs BWLKF (5.24M).
BWLKFCIOXYBWLKF / CIOXY
Capitalization4.07M2.82B0%
EBITDA-2.16M5.13B-0%
Gain YTD-16.6670.000-
P/E RatioN/A8.27-
Revenue5.24M10.4B0%
Total Cash195K1.04B0%
Total Debt3.39M3.61B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWLKF vs CIOXY: Fundamental Ratings
BWLKF
CIOXY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10092
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8773
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9044

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIOXY's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BWLKF (97). This means that CIOXY’s stock grew significantly faster than BWLKF’s over the last 12 months.

CIOXY's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as BWLKF (100). This means that CIOXY’s stock grew similarly to BWLKF’s over the last 12 months.

CIOXY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BWLKF (100). This means that CIOXY’s stock grew similarly to BWLKF’s over the last 12 months.

CIOXY's Price Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as BWLKF (87). This means that CIOXY’s stock grew similarly to BWLKF’s over the last 12 months.

CIOXY's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BWLKF (100). This means that CIOXY’s stock grew similarly to BWLKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWLKFCIOXY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
63%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWLKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME22.790.29
+1.29%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X112544.8050001322.742200
+1.19%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL232.562.07
+0.90%
Apple
SPY648.922.29
+0.35%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA345.98-3.62
-1.04%
Tesla

BWLKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BWLKF and AIMLF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BWLKF and AIMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWLKF
1D Price
Change %
BWLKF100%
N/A
AIMLF - BWLKF
20%
Poorly correlated
+14.81%
CCOEF - BWLKF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIOXY - BWLKF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYSD - BWLKF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDTAF - BWLKF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CIOXY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIOXY has been loosely correlated with IMXI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIOXY jumps, then IMXI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIOXY
1D Price
Change %
CIOXY100%
N/A
IMXI - CIOXY
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
PAYS - CIOXY
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SBIG - CIOXY
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
SABR - CIOXY
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
GTLB - CIOXY
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.73%
More