BWLKF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
19.96M
CIOXY
Price
$0.84
Change
-$0.01 (-1.18%)
Updated
Sep 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.69B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWLKF vs CIOXY

Header iconBWLKF vs CIOXY Comparison
Open Charts BWLKF vs CIOXYBanner chart's image
Boardwalktech Software
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$46.2K
Capitalization19.96M
Cielo SA
Price$0.84
Change-$0.01 (-1.18%)
Volume$59.12K
Capitalization2.69B
BWLKF vs CIOXY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWLKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIOXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWLKF vs. CIOXY commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLKF is a Hold and CIOXY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BWLKF: $0.06 vs. CIOXY: $0.84)
Brand notoriety: BWLKF and CIOXY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWLKF: 122% vs. CIOXY: 100%
Market capitalization -- BWLKF: $19.96M vs. CIOXY: $2.69B
BWLKF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $19.96M. CIOXY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWLKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCIOXY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BWLKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CIOXY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIOXY is a better buy in the long-term than BWLKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWLKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CIOXY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWLKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CIOXY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIOXY is a better buy in the short-term than BWLKF.

Price Growth

BWLKF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.13% price change this week, while CIOXY (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.04% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIOXY($2.7B) has a higher market cap than BWLKF($20M). CIOXY YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. BWLKF (-19.028). CIOXY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.37B vs. BWLKF (-3.39M). CIOXY has more cash in the bank: 2.35B vs. BWLKF (373K). BWLKF has less debt than CIOXY: BWLKF (225K) vs CIOXY (6.47B). CIOXY has higher revenues than BWLKF: CIOXY (10.5B) vs BWLKF (6.02M).
BWLKFCIOXYBWLKF / CIOXY
Capitalization20M2.7B1%
EBITDA-3.39M5.37B-0%
Gain YTD-19.0280.000-
P/E RatioN/A7.23-
Revenue6.02M10.5B0%
Total Cash373K2.35B0%
Total Debt225K6.47B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWLKF vs CIOXY: Fundamental Ratings
BWLKF
CIOXY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10076
SMR RATING
1..100
10054
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9473
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10029
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3685

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIOXY's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BWLKF (97). This means that CIOXY’s stock grew significantly faster than BWLKF’s over the last 12 months.

CIOXY's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as BWLKF (100). This means that CIOXY’s stock grew similarly to BWLKF’s over the last 12 months.

CIOXY's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWLKF (100). This means that CIOXY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWLKF’s over the last 12 months.

CIOXY's Price Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as BWLKF (94). This means that CIOXY’s stock grew similarly to BWLKF’s over the last 12 months.

CIOXY's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BWLKF (100). This means that CIOXY’s stock grew significantly faster than BWLKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWLKFCIOXY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
89%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWLKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIOXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL220.036.78
+3.18%
Apple
BTC.X117472.0100002444.000000
+2.12%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA322.272.36
+0.74%
Tesla
SPY632.254.28
+0.68%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
GME22.65-0.16
-0.70%
GameStop Corp

BWLKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BWLKF and AIMLF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BWLKF and AIMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWLKF
1D Price
Change %
BWLKF100%
+12.77%
AIMLF - BWLKF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
CCOEF - BWLKF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIOXY - BWLKF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYSD - BWLKF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDTAF - BWLKF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More

CIOXY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIOXY and SBIG have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIOXY and SBIG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIOXY
1D Price
Change %
CIOXY100%
N/A
SBIG - CIOXY
29%
Poorly correlated
-12.00%
GTLB - CIOXY
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.87%
MTLS - CIOXY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
REKR - CIOXY
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
COGZF - CIOXY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More