Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BWLRX vs RMFCX
BWLRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BWLRX vs RMFCX
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value R6
Price$25.71
Change+$0.07 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets227.77M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.47
Change+$0.12 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
BWLRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BWLRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. BWLRX (228M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BWLRX: RMFCX (1.26) vs BWLRX (1.14). BWLRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BWLRX (8 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than BWLRX (0.82). BWLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). BWLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: BWLRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.64 vs. BWLRX (-2.27). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.96 vs. BWLRX (23.56).
| BWLRX | RMFCX | BWLRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.91 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.91 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.467 | 11.458 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 228M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.26 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.27 | 6.64 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.16 | 28.51 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.56 | 53.96 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement