Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BWLRX vs RMFEX
BWLRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts BWLRX vs RMFEX
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value R6
Price$26.71
Change+$0.16 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.97M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.58
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
BWLRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BWLRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLRX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. BWLRX (229M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than BWLRX: RMFEX (1.46) vs BWLRX (1.08). BWLRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: BWLRX (8 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). BWLRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). BWLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). BWLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: BWLRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. BWLRX (-1.55). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 63.30 vs. BWLRX (28.87).
| BWLRX | RMFEX | BWLRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.62 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.62 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.142 | 15.212 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.46 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.55 | 7.77 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.63 | 45.19 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.87 | 63.30 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement