Advertisement
BWMN vs ELWSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWMN is a Hold and ELWSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BWMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileELWSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BWMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ELWSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BWMN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ELWSF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BWMN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- ELWSF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BWMN (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +3.06% price change this week, while ELWSF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +473.08%.
Reported Earning Dates
BWMN is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+1.70% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| BWMN | ELWSF | BWMN / ELWSF | |
| Capitalization | 616M | 194M | 318% |
| EBITDA | 30.3M | -89.76M | -34% |
| Gain YTD | 43.246 | -76.406 | -57% |
| P/E Ratio | 210.24 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 445M | 24.9M | 1,787% |
| Total Cash | 10.7M | 72.2M | 15% |
| Total Debt | 157M | 4.39M | 3,578% |
| BWMN | ELWSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 33% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 68% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OIGIX | 34.79 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco Oppenheimer International Gr R6 | |||
| CGACX | 11.62 | N/A | N/A |
| Calvert Global Energy Solutions C | |||
| BMPIX | 104.96 | N/A | N/A |
| ProFunds Materials UltraSector Inv | |||
| OANEX | 22.79 | N/A | N/A |
| Oakmark International Small Cap Instl | |||
| RYSEX | 14.28 | -0.14 | -0.97% |
| Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Invmt | |||
BWMN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWMN has been loosely correlated with GVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWMN jumps, then GVA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BWMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BWMN | 100% | +3.87% | ||
| GVA - BWMN | 46% Loosely correlated | +8.14% | ||
| STRL - BWMN | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| MTZ - BWMN | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| ORN - BWMN | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| PRIM - BWMN | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
More | ||||
ELWSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ELWSF and BFLBF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELWSF and BFLBF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ELWSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELWSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BFLBF - ELWSF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GRHI - ELWSF | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VATE - ELWSF | 3% Poorly correlated | -19.89% | ||
| BWMN - ELWSF | 2% Poorly correlated | +3.87% | ||
| CADLF - ELWSF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||