BWMN
Price
$26.65
Change
+$0.71 (+2.74%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
447.03M
61 days until earnings call
MCDIF
Price
$11.63
Change
-$0.37 (-3.08%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWMN vs MCDIF

Header iconBWMN vs MCDIF Comparison
Open Charts BWMN vs MCDIFBanner chart's image
Bowman Consulting Group
Price$26.65
Change+$0.71 (+2.74%)
Volume$82.52K
Capitalization447.03M
McDermott International
Price$11.63
Change-$0.37 (-3.08%)
Volume$560
CapitalizationN/A
BWMN vs MCDIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BWMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWMN vs. MCDIF commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWMN is a Buy and MCDIF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BWMN: $26.65 vs. MCDIF: $11.63)
Brand notoriety: BWMN and MCDIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWMN: 94% vs. MCDIF: 3%
Market capitalization -- BWMN: $447.03M vs. MCDIF: $0
BWMN [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $447.03M. MCDIF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCDIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCDIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWMN is a better buy in the long-term than MCDIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWMN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BWMN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BWMN (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +4.96% price change this week, while MCDIF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -19.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWMN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+1.36% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWMN YTD gains are higher at: 6.814 vs. MCDIF (-22.467).
BWMNMCDIFBWMN / MCDIF
Capitalization447MN/A-
EBITDA30.3MN/A-
Gain YTD6.814-22.467-30%
P/E Ratio152.59N/A-
Revenue445MN/A-
Total Cash10.7MN/A-
Total Debt157MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWMN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGRCX14.98N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
EQNUX21.64N/A
N/A
MFS Equity Income R4
APLIX11.71N/A
N/A
Cavanal Hill Hedged Equity Income Inv
AMKIX12.30N/A
N/A
American Century Emerging Markets I
LGLVX51.61N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R6

BWMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWMN has been loosely correlated with GVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWMN jumps, then GVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWMN
1D Price
Change %
BWMN100%
+2.74%
GVA - BWMN
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
FIX - BWMN
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
STRL - BWMN
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
PRIM - BWMN
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
BLD - BWMN
45%
Loosely correlated
+5.12%
More

MCDIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCDIF and EKIVY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCDIF and EKIVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCDIF
1D Price
Change %
MCDIF100%
-3.08%
EKIVY - MCDIF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
J - MCDIF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
BWMN - MCDIF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
OPMXF - MCDIF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
ROAD - MCDIF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
More