BWTL
Price
$4.25
Change
+$0.20 (+4.94%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
16.14M
CDNAF
Price
$124.23
Change
-$0.27 (-0.22%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
6.86B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWTL vs CDNAF

Header iconBWTL vs CDNAF Comparison
Open Charts BWTL vs CDNAFBanner chart's image
Bowlin Travel Centers
Price$4.25
Change+$0.20 (+4.94%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization16.14M
Canadian Tire
Price$124.23
Change-$0.27 (-0.22%)
Volume$7.7K
Capitalization6.86B
BWTL vs CDNAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWTL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWTL vs. CDNAF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWTL is a Hold and CDNAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BWTL: $4.25 vs. CDNAF: $124.23)
Brand notoriety: BWTL and CDNAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWTL: 152% vs. CDNAF: 8%
Market capitalization -- BWTL: $16.14M vs. CDNAF: $6.86B
BWTL [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $16.14M. CDNAF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $6.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $47.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWTL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCDNAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWTL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BWTL and CDNAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWTL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDNAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWTL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CDNAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BWTL and CDNAF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BWTL (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) price change was +3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.70% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNAF($6.86B) has a higher market cap than BWTL($16.1M). CDNAF YTD gains are higher at: 18.427 vs. BWTL (6.250).
BWTLCDNAFBWTL / CDNAF
Capitalization16.1M6.86B0%
EBITDAN/A2.03B-
Gain YTD6.25018.42734%
P/E RatioN/A11.72-
RevenueN/A16.7B-
Total CashN/A1.19B-
Total DebtN/A7.62B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWTL vs CDNAF: Fundamental Ratings
BWTL
CDNAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4957
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7070
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDNAF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWTL (46). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWTL’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as BWTL (70). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to BWTL’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BWTL (100). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to BWTL’s over the last 12 months.

BWTL's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNAF (57). This means that BWTL’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

BWTL's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNAF (100). This means that BWTL’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWTLCDNAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWTL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BWET12.630.19
+1.53%
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
QCJL22.970.07
+0.30%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Jul
DFGX53.490.07
+0.13%
Dimensional Global ex US Cor Fxd Inc ETF
CAMX31.71N/A
N/A
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF
BUSA34.67-0.05
-0.14%
Brandes U.S. Value ETF

BWTL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BWTL and AOCIF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BWTL and AOCIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWTL
1D Price
Change %
BWTL100%
N/A
AOCIF - BWTL
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
HPCRF - BWTL
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDNAF - BWTL
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
VRM - BWTL
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
CYYHF - BWTL
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CDNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNAF
1D Price
Change %
CDNAF100%
-0.22%
PAG - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
SAH - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
AN - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
KMX - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
LAD - CDNAF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
More