BWTL
Price
$4.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.46M
CDNAF
Price
$133.17
Change
+$0.32 (+0.24%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWTL vs CDNAF

Header iconBWTL vs CDNAF Comparison
Open Charts BWTL vs CDNAFBanner chart's image
Bowlin Travel Centers
Price$4.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization5.46M
Canadian Tire
Price$133.17
Change+$0.32 (+0.24%)
Volume$9.31K
Capitalization8B
BWTL vs CDNAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWTL vs. CDNAF commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWTL is a Hold and CDNAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BWTL: $4.00 vs. CDNAF: $133.17)
Brand notoriety: BWTL and CDNAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWTL: 237% vs. CDNAF: 91%
Market capitalization -- BWTL: $5.46M vs. CDNAF: $8B
BWTL [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $5.46M. CDNAF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWTL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCDNAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWTL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNAF is a better buy in the long-term than BWTL.

Price Growth

BWTL (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) price change was +1.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.61% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNAF($8B) has a higher market cap than BWTL($5.46M). CDNAF YTD gains are higher at: 26.946 vs. BWTL (0.000). CDNAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.22B vs. BWTL (1.03M). CDNAF has more cash in the bank: 489M vs. BWTL (4.58M). BWTL has less debt than CDNAF: BWTL (6.91M) vs CDNAF (8.38B). CDNAF has higher revenues than BWTL: CDNAF (17.7B) vs BWTL (27.5M).
BWTLCDNAFBWTL / CDNAF
Capitalization5.46M8B0%
EBITDA1.03M2.22B0%
Gain YTD0.00026.946-
P/E RatioN/A12.22-
Revenue27.5M17.7B0%
Total Cash4.58M489M1%
Total Debt6.91M8.38B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWTL vs CDNAF: Fundamental Ratings
BWTL
CDNAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3458
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7658
SMR RATING
1..100
755
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9797
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDNAF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWTL (47). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWTL’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as BWTL (76). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to BWTL’s over the last 12 months.

BWTL's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNAF (55). This means that BWTL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BWTL (51). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to BWTL’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as BWTL (97). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to BWTL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRDVX20.72N/A
N/A
BlackRock Equity Dividend R
CHCLX11.42N/A
N/A
AB Discovery Growth A
GPIIX3.45N/A
N/A
Grandeur Peak International Opps Instl
NMFIX13.32N/A
N/A
Northern Multi-Mgr Glbl Listed Infra
JGQIX17.72N/A
N/A
Jensen Global Quality Growth I

BWTL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BWTL and AOCIF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BWTL and AOCIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWTL
1D Price
Change %
BWTL100%
N/A
AOCIF - BWTL
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HPCRF - BWTL
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDNAF - BWTL
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
VRM - BWTL
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.85%
CYYHF - BWTL
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CDNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNAF
1D Price
Change %
CDNAF100%
+0.24%
PAG - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
SAH - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
AN - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
KMX - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
LAD - CDNAF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
More