BXBLY
Price
$30.33
Change
-$0.42 (-1.37%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
13.12B
56 days until earnings call
CNGO
Price
$23.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
828.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BXBLY vs CNGO

Header iconBXBLY vs CNGO Comparison
Open Charts BXBLY vs CNGOBanner chart's image
Brambles
Price$30.33
Change-$0.42 (-1.37%)
Volume$19.7K
Capitalization13.12B
Cengage Learning Holdings II
Price$23.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200K
Capitalization828.12M
BXBLY vs CNGO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BXBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BXBLY vs. CNGO commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BXBLY is a Hold and CNGO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BXBLY: $30.38 vs. CNGO: $23.50)
Brand notoriety: BXBLY and CNGO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BXBLY: 61% vs. CNGO: 105%
Market capitalization -- BXBLY: $13.12B vs. CNGO: $828.12M
BXBLY [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $13.12B. CNGO’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $828.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BXBLY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCNGO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BXBLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CNGO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BXBLY is a better buy in the long-term than CNGO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BXBLY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BXBLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BXBLY (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +0.36% price change this week, while CNGO (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

BXBLY is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-0.03% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BXBLY($13.1B) has a higher market cap than CNGO($828M). BXBLY YTD gains are higher at: 28.648 vs. CNGO (20.513). BXBLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.65B vs. CNGO (330M). CNGO has more cash in the bank: 266M vs. BXBLY (148M). CNGO has less debt than BXBLY: CNGO (1.66B) vs BXBLY (2.88B). BXBLY has higher revenues than CNGO: BXBLY (5.72B) vs CNGO (1.34B).
BXBLYCNGOBXBLY / CNGO
Capitalization13.1B828M1,582%
EBITDA1.65B330M501%
Gain YTD28.64820.513140%
P/E Ratio21.93N/A-
Revenue5.72B1.34B428%
Total Cash148M266M56%
Total Debt2.88B1.66B173%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BXBLY vs CNGO: Fundamental Ratings
BXBLY
CNGO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
625
SMR RATING
1..100
89100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2069
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BXBLY's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNGO (78). This means that BXBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNGO’s over the last 12 months.

BXBLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as CNGO (25). This means that BXBLY’s stock grew similarly to CNGO’s over the last 12 months.

BXBLY's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as CNGO (100). This means that BXBLY’s stock grew similarly to CNGO’s over the last 12 months.

BXBLY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CNGO (42). This means that BXBLY’s stock grew similarly to CNGO’s over the last 12 months.

BXBLY's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNGO (69). This means that BXBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNGO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BXBLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BXBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSEM42.840.19
+0.45%
Tower Semiconductor Ltd
FNLC24.70-0.09
-0.38%
First Bancorp
OKE80.19-0.37
-0.46%
Oneok
ALEX17.61-0.55
-3.03%
Alexander & Baldwin
ESLA0.93-0.03
-3.07%
Estrella Immunopharma

CNGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNGO and STGXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNGO and STGXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNGO
1D Price
Change %
CNGO100%
N/A
STGXF - CNGO
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COGNY - CNGO
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.21%
BXBLY - CNGO
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
CPBLF - CNGO
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DELRF - CNGO
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More