Ad is loading...
BXMDX vs GSGPX
BXMDX vs GSGPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BXMDX vs. GSGPX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BXMDX is a Hold and GSGPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSGPX has more cash in the bank: 4.57B vs. BXMDX (3.63B). BXMDX pays higher dividends than GSGPX: BXMDX (5.59) vs GSGPX (1.14). BXMDX was incepted earlier than GSGPX: BXMDX (10 years) vs GSGPX (7 years). BXMDX (5.51) is less costly to investors than GSGPX (0.86). BXMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 556.00 vs. GSGPX (126.00). GSGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than BXMDX: GSGPX (0) vs BXMDX (10000). BXMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.53 vs. GSGPX (0.73). BXMDX return over 5 years is better than : 27.83 vs. GSGPX (17.95).
| BXMDX | GSGPX | BXMDX / GSGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 5.48 | 0.73 | 751% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.51 | 0.86 | 641% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.782 | -2.708 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.63B | 4.57B | 79% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.59 | 1.14 | 492% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.53 | 0.73 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.21 | 10.22 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.83 | 17.95 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.96 | N/A | - |