BXRBF
Price
$6.30
Change
+$0.52 (+9.00%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Capitalization
4.89B
SFDL
Price
$30.65
Change
+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
95.74M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BXRBF vs SFDL

Header iconBXRBF vs SFDL Comparison
Open Charts BXRBF vs SFDLBanner chart's image
Bendigo & Adelaide Bank
Price$6.30
Change+$0.52 (+9.00%)
Volume$897
Capitalization4.89B
Security Federal
Price$30.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Volume$853
Capitalization95.74M
BXRBF vs SFDL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SFDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BXRBF vs. SFDL commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BXRBF is a Buy and SFDL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BXRBF: $6.30 vs. SFDL: $30.65)
Brand notoriety: BXRBF and SFDL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BXRBF: 100% vs. SFDL: 97%
Market capitalization -- BXRBF: $4.89B vs. SFDL: $95.74M
BXRBF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.89B. SFDL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $95.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BXRBF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSFDL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BXRBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SFDL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BXRBF is a better buy in the long-term than SFDL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SFDL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SFDL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

BXRBF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SFDL (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BXRBF($4.89B) has a higher market cap than SFDL($95.7M). BXRBF has higher P/E ratio than SFDL: BXRBF (11.37) vs SFDL (9.79). SFDL YTD gains are higher at: 14.412 vs. BXRBF (0.000). SFDL has less debt than BXRBF: SFDL (40.9M) vs BXRBF (11.6B). BXRBF has higher revenues than SFDL: BXRBF (1.93B) vs SFDL (53M).
BXRBFSFDLBXRBF / SFDL
Capitalization4.89B95.7M5,106%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00014.412-
P/E Ratio11.379.79116%
Revenue1.93B53M3,634%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt11.6B40.9M28,362%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BXRBF vs SFDL: Fundamental Ratings
BXRBF
SFDL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4540
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2557
SMR RATING
1..100
1168
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6740
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1035

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BXRBF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as SFDL (33). This means that BXRBF’s stock grew similarly to SFDL’s over the last 12 months.

BXRBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as SFDL (57). This means that BXRBF’s stock grew similarly to SFDL’s over the last 12 months.

BXRBF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFDL (68). This means that BXRBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFDL’s over the last 12 months.

SFDL's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as BXRBF (71). This means that SFDL’s stock grew similarly to BXRBF’s over the last 12 months.

SFDL's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as BXRBF (67). This means that SFDL’s stock grew similarly to BXRBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BXRBFSFDL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SFDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JAMVX17.710.07
+0.40%
Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Instl
RIEBX27.110.05
+0.18%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2E
MEFNX10.49N/A
N/A
MassMutual Mid Cap Growth R3
HSCCX2.76N/A
N/A
Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth C
ABCVX23.51-0.02
-0.08%
American Beacon The London Co Inc Eq Inv

BXRBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BXRBF has been loosely correlated with CMGGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BXRBF jumps, then CMGGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BXRBF
1D Price
Change %
BXRBF100%
N/A
CMGGF - BXRBF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SFDL - BXRBF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSRL - BXRBF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCBS - BXRBF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
UBCP - BXRBF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
More

SFDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFDL and BXRBF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFDL and BXRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFDL
1D Price
Change %
SFDL100%
N/A
BXRBF - SFDL
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNFSF - SFDL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALIF - SFDL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVAL - SFDL
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
CMGGF - SFDL
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More