BY
Price
$25.82
Change
+$0.21 (+0.82%)
Updated
Aug 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
937.28M
80 days until earnings call
EFSC
Price
$54.23
Change
+$0.42 (+0.78%)
Updated
Aug 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.47B
84 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BY vs EFSC

Header iconBY vs EFSC Comparison
Open Charts BY vs EFSCBanner chart's image
Byline Ban
Price$25.82
Change+$0.21 (+0.82%)
Volume$2.52K
Capitalization937.28M
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$54.23
Change+$0.42 (+0.78%)
Volume$1.05K
Capitalization1.47B
BY vs EFSC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BY vs. EFSC commentary
Aug 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BY is a Buy and EFSC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BY: $25.61 vs. EFSC: $53.81)
Brand notoriety: BY and EFSC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BY: 83% vs. EFSC: 134%
Market capitalization -- BY: $937.28M vs. EFSC: $1.47B
BY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $937.28M. EFSC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEFSC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BY is a better buy in the long-term than EFSC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EFSC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EFSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BY is a better buy in the short-term than EFSC.

Price Growth

BY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.46% price change this week, while EFSC (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

BY is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.37% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($1.47B) has a higher market cap than BY($937M). BY (7.91) and EFSC (7.73) have similar P/E ratio . EFSC YTD gains are higher at: -3.530 vs. BY (-11.040). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 193M vs. BY (71.2M). EFSC has less debt than BY: EFSC (204M) vs BY (513M). EFSC has higher revenues than BY: EFSC (550M) vs BY (384M).
BYEFSCBY / EFSC
Capitalization937M1.47B64%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-11.040-3.530313%
P/E Ratio7.917.73102%
Revenue384M550M70%
Total Cash71.2M193M37%
Total Debt513M204M251%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BY vs EFSC: Fundamental Ratings
BY
EFSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3331
SMR RATING
1..100
1412
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7659
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5461
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BY's Valuation (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (58). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BY (33). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to BY’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BY (14). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to BY’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BY (76). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to BY’s over the last 12 months.

BY's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (61). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYEFSC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JOSSX51.94-0.26
-0.50%
Johnson Opportunity S
PIIDX14.82-0.08
-0.54%
Principal International Equity R-6
INSAX24.26-0.16
-0.66%
Catalyst Insider Buying A
JCVWX23.88-0.37
-1.53%
JHancock Classic Value R6
DREQX21.01-0.45
-2.10%
BNY Mellon Research Growth Z

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
-2.50%
STBA - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
-2.48%
FNB - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
-3.00%
BY - EFSC
89%
Closely correlated
-2.62%
UCB - EFSC
89%
Closely correlated
-1.93%
FULT - EFSC
89%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
More