BYCRF vs GLDAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYCRF is a Hold and GLDAF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BYCRF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGLDAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BYCRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- GLDAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BYCRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLDAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BYCRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- GLDAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
BYCRF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -5.62% price change this week, while GLDAF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.68%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.50% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| BYCRF | GLDAF | BYCRF / GLDAF | |
| Capitalization | 4.98B | 1.91B | 261% |
| EBITDA | 32.5B | 72.7M | 44,704% |
| Gain YTD | -0.563 | 49.254 | -1% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.09 | 39.68 | 88% |
| Revenue | 80.3B | 243M | 33,045% |
| Total Cash | 34.9B | 34M | 102,647% |
| Total Debt | 3.64B | 314M | 1,158% |
| BYCRF | GLDAF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 17% | 8 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 29% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 27% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 25% | 8 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 29% | 3 days ago 33% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 32% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 13% | 3 days ago 58% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PUFCX | 21.45 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM Jennison Financial Services C | |||
| MRVAX | 12.44 | -0.01 | -0.08% |
| Mirova International Sustainable Eq A | |||
| TIRTX | 29.75 | -0.15 | -0.50% |
| Nuveen Large Cap Growth A | |||
| HFCGX | 33.14 | -0.27 | -0.81% |
| Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor | |||
| CSSCX | 21.68 | -0.25 | -1.14% |
| Columbia Small Cap Value I C | |||
BYCRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BYCRF and EUBG have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYCRF and EUBG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BYCRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYCRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EUBG - BYCRF | 28% Poorly correlated | -6.46% | ||
| UDMY - BYCRF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
| IPHLF - BYCRF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GLDAF - BYCRF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KPGHF - BYCRF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
GLDAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GLDAF and NSYC have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLDAF and NSYC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLDAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLDAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NSYC - GLDAF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WBQNL - GLDAF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.73% | ||
| NPLS - GLDAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IPHLF - GLDAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BYCRF - GLDAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||