BYCRF vs KPGHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYCRF is a Hold and KPGHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BYCRF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileKPGHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BYCRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- KPGHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BYCRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KPGHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BYCRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
- KPGHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BYCRF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KPGHF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +1.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.35%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.70% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| BYCRF | KPGHF | BYCRF / KPGHF | |
| Capitalization | 4.98B | 144M | 3,459% |
| EBITDA | 32.5B | 24.2M | 134,298% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.945 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 35.09 | 46.73 | 75% |
| Revenue | 80.3B | 77.9M | 103,081% |
| Total Cash | 34.9B | 2.97M | 1,175,480% |
| Total Debt | 3.64B | 53.7M | 6,773% |
| BYCRF | KPGHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 45% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 25% | 12 days ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 53% | 12 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 32% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 39% | 12 days ago 40% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 32% | 12 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 20 days ago 32% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 33% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 56% | 12 days ago 73% |
BYCRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BYCRF and EUBG have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYCRF and EUBG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BYCRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYCRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EUBG - BYCRF | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.34% | ||
| UDMY - BYCRF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.17% | ||
| IPHLF - BYCRF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GLDAF - BYCRF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KPGHF - BYCRF | -1% Poorly correlated | +1.94% | ||
More | ||||
KPGHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KPGHF and NSYC have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KPGHF and NSYC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KPGHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPGHF | 100% | +1.94% | ||
| NSYC - KPGHF | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
| NPLS - KPGHF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MRLWF - KPGHF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
| IPHLF - KPGHF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BYCRF - KPGHF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||