Advertisement
BZ vs DBEM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZ is a StrongBuy and DBEM is a StrongBuy.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BZ’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BZ’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
| BZ | DBEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 79% | 9 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 82% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SDVY | 34.91 | 0.43 | +1.25% |
| First Trust SMID Cp Rising Div Achv ETF | |||
| LGRO | 35.55 | 0.24 | +0.68% |
| Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF | |||
| BGT | 12.32 | 0.02 | +0.16% |
| BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | |||
| RFCI | 22.36 | N/A | N/A |
| RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | |||
| IBHF | 22.99 | -0.06 | -0.26% |
| iShares iBonds 2026 Term HY & Inc ETF | |||
BZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BZ and UPWK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZ and UPWK's prices will move in lockstep.
DBEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DBEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DBEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBEM | 100% | +0.98% | ||
| BABA - DBEM | 70% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| KC - DBEM | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.23% | ||
| BZ - DBEM | 62% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| JD - DBEM | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| BILI - DBEM | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
More | ||||