Advertisement
BZ vs EMGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZ is a StrongBuy and EMGF is a Buy.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BZ’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BZ’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
| BZ | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 79% | about 1 month ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SDVY | 34.91 | 0.43 | +1.25% |
| First Trust SMID Cp Rising Div Achv ETF | |||
| LGRO | 35.55 | 0.24 | +0.68% |
| Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF | |||
| BGT | 12.32 | 0.02 | +0.16% |
| BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | |||
| RFCI | 22.36 | N/A | N/A |
| RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | |||
| IBHF | 22.99 | -0.06 | -0.26% |
| iShares iBonds 2026 Term HY & Inc ETF | |||
BZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BZ and UPWK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZ and UPWK's prices will move in lockstep.
EMGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMGF has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMGF jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMGF | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| BABA - EMGF | 71% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| BZ - EMGF | 61% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NOAH - EMGF | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| QFIN - EMGF | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| BEKE - EMGF | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
More | ||||