Advertisement
BZ vs JEMA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZ is a StrongBuy and JEMA is a Buy.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BZ’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BZ’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
| BZ | JEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 79% | 17 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SDVY | 34.91 | 0.43 | +1.25% |
| First Trust SMID Cp Rising Div Achv ETF | |||
| LGRO | 35.55 | 0.24 | +0.68% |
| Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF | |||
| BGT | 12.32 | 0.02 | +0.16% |
| BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | |||
| RFCI | 22.36 | N/A | N/A |
| RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | |||
| IBHF | 22.99 | -0.06 | -0.26% |
| iShares iBonds 2026 Term HY & Inc ETF | |||
BZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BZ and UPWK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZ and UPWK's prices will move in lockstep.
JEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JEMA has been loosely correlated with YMM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JEMA jumps, then YMM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JEMA | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| YMM - JEMA | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| NIO - JEMA | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| BZ - JEMA | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| VALE - JEMA | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| CPA - JEMA | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.11% | ||
More | ||||