BZLFF
Price
$44.51
Change
+$0.49 (+1.11%)
Updated
Nov 27 closing price
BZLFY
Price
$21.22
Change
+$0.38 (+1.82%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
67 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BZLFF vs BZLFY

Header iconBZLFF vs BZLFY Comparison
Open Charts BZLFF vs BZLFYBanner chart's image
Bunzl
Price$44.51
Change+$0.49 (+1.11%)
Volume$1.12K
CapitalizationN/A
Bunzl
Price$21.22
Change+$0.38 (+1.82%)
Volume$27.87K
CapitalizationN/A
BZLFF vs BZLFY Comparison Chart
Loading...
BZLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BZLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZLFF vs. BZLFY commentary
Dec 26, 2024

To understand the difference between Bunzl plc (BZLFF) vs. Bunzl plc - ADR (BZLFY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR

ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2024
Stock price -- (BZLFF: $44.51 vs. BZLFY: $21.22)
Brand notoriety: BZLFF and BZLFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZLFF: 198% vs. BZLFY: 61%
Market capitalization -- BZLFF: $12.54B vs. BZLFY: $12.54B
BZLFF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $12.54B. BZLFY’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $12.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $40.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZLFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBZLFY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BZLFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BZLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZLFF is a better buy in the long-term than BZLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZLFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BZLFY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZLFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • BZLFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BZLFF and BZLFY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BZLFF (@Food Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BZLFY (@Food Distributors) price change was -1.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

BZLFY is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-0.94% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZLFF($12.5B) and BZLFY($12.5B) have the same market capitalization . BZLFF (20.45) and BZLFY (20.20) have similar P/E ratio . BZLFY YTD gains are higher at: 12.861 vs. BZLFF (10.804). BZLFF (1.04B) and BZLFY (1.04B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . BZLFF (12B) and BZLFY (12B) have equivalent revenues.
BZLFFBZLFYBZLFF / BZLFY
Capitalization12.5B12.5B100%
EBITDA1.04B1.04B100%
Gain YTD10.80412.86184%
P/E Ratio20.4520.20101%
Revenue12B12B100%
Total Cash1.5BN/A-
Total Debt3.13BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZLFF vs BZLFY: Fundamental Ratings
BZLFF
BZLFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2213
SMR RATING
1..100
8388
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5055
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2892
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BZLFY's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLFF (53). This means that BZLFY’s stock grew similarly to BZLFF’s over the last 12 months.

BZLFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLFF (22). This means that BZLFY’s stock grew similarly to BZLFF’s over the last 12 months.

BZLFF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLFY (88). This means that BZLFF’s stock grew similarly to BZLFY’s over the last 12 months.

BZLFF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLFY (55). This means that BZLFF’s stock grew similarly to BZLFY’s over the last 12 months.

BZLFF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BZLFY (92). This means that BZLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BZLFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZLFFBZLFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BZLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BZLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMMMX43.980.42
+0.96%
American Funds AMCAP 529-F-2
FTGRX25.750.21
+0.82%
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock M
ESIFX12.010.09
+0.76%
Eaton Vance Balanced R6
GFGEX12.860.08
+0.63%
Guardian Fundamental Glb Eq instl
HERAX10.340.02
+0.19%
Hartford Emerging Markets Equity A

BZLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZLFF and HFFG have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZLFF and HFFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZLFF
1D Price
Change %
BZLFF100%
N/A
HFFG - BZLFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
WILC - BZLFF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
BZLFY - BZLFF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
AIXN - BZLFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVFH - BZLFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.39%
More

BZLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZLFY and PFGC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZLFY and PFGC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZLFY
1D Price
Change %
BZLFY100%
+1.82%
PFGC - BZLFY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
SYY - BZLFY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
HFFG - BZLFY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
SPTN - BZLFY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
USFD - BZLFY
18%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
More