Advertisement
BZLFF vs BZLFY
To understand the difference between Bunzl plc (BZLFF) vs. Bunzl plc - ADR (BZLFY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BZLFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBZLFY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BZLFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- BZLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BZLFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BZLFY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BZLFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- BZLFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BZLFF (@Food Distributors) experienced а +15.24% price change this week, while BZLFY (@Food Distributors) price change was +5.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was +16.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.62%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food Distributors (+16.62% weekly)Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.
| BZLFF | BZLFY | BZLFF / BZLFY | |
| Capitalization | 10.9B | 10.9B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 1.17B | 1.23B | 95% |
| Gain YTD | -23.388 | -16.984 | 138% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.40 | 17.22 | 101% |
| Revenue | 11.6B | 11.8B | 98% |
| Total Cash | 1.38B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 3.4B | N/A | - |
BZLFF | BZLFY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BZLFY's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLFF (34). This means that BZLFY’s stock grew similarly to BZLFF’s over the last 12 months.
BZLFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLFF (78). This means that BZLFY’s stock grew similarly to BZLFF’s over the last 12 months.
BZLFY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLFF (100). This means that BZLFY’s stock grew similarly to BZLFF’s over the last 12 months.
BZLFY's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLFF (62). This means that BZLFY’s stock grew similarly to BZLFF’s over the last 12 months.
BZLFY's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLFF (100). This means that BZLFY’s stock grew similarly to BZLFF’s over the last 12 months.
| BZLFF | BZLFY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 10% | 10 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 20% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 20% | 2 days ago 42% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HELX | 29.85 | 0.13 | +0.45% |
| Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF | |||
| UTF | 26.62 | 0.11 | +0.41% |
| Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund | |||
| HNW | 12.81 | 0.05 | +0.39% |
| Pioneer Diversified High Income Fund | |||
| LTTI | 19.37 | 0.08 | +0.39% |
| FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF | |||
| LEO | 5.89 | 0.01 | +0.17% |
| BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals | |||
BZLFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BZLFF and HFFG have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZLFF and HFFG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BZLFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BZLFF | 100% | +4.63% | ||
| HFFG - BZLFF | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.87% | ||
| WILC - BZLFF | 9% Poorly correlated | -4.71% | ||
| BZLFY - BZLFF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| AIXN - BZLFF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IVFH - BZLFF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
More | ||||
BZLFY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BZLFY and PFGC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZLFY and PFGC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BZLFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BZLFY | 100% | -0.06% | ||
| PFGC - BZLFY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.40% | ||
| SYY - BZLFY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
| HFFG - BZLFY | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.87% | ||
| SPTN - BZLFY | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
| USFD - BZLFY | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||