BZLYF
Price
$10.71
Change
+$0.19 (+1.81%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
6.35B
FACO
Price
$3.40
Change
+$0.01 (+0.29%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
124.6M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZLYF vs FACO

Header iconBZLYF vs FACO Comparison
Open Charts BZLYF vs FACOBanner chart's image
Beazley
Price$10.71
Change+$0.19 (+1.81%)
Volume$3.15K
Capitalization6.35B
First Acceptance
Price$3.40
Change+$0.01 (+0.29%)
Volume$1.57K
Capitalization124.6M
BZLYF vs FACO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BZLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FACO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZLYF vs. FACO commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZLYF is a Hold and FACO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BZLYF: $10.51 vs. FACO: $3.39)
Brand notoriety: BZLYF and FACO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZLYF: 69% vs. FACO: 69%
Market capitalization -- BZLYF: $6.35B vs. FACO: $124.6M
BZLYF [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $6.35B. FACO’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $124.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $16.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZLYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFACO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BZLYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FACO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FACO is a better buy in the long-term than BZLYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZLYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FACO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZLYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FACO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FACO is a better buy in the short-term than BZLYF.

Price Growth

BZLYF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +1.08% price change this week, while FACO (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -4.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-0.20% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZLYF($6.36B) has a higher market cap than FACO($125M). BZLYF has higher P/E ratio than FACO: BZLYF (7.09) vs FACO (5.48). FACO YTD gains are higher at: 12.211 vs. BZLYF (7.168). BZLYF has more cash in the bank: 986M vs. FACO (401M). FACO has less debt than BZLYF: FACO (45.2M) vs BZLYF (620M). BZLYF has higher revenues than FACO: BZLYF (1.16B) vs FACO (522M).
BZLYFFACOBZLYF / FACO
Capitalization6.36B125M5,084%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.16812.21159%
P/E Ratio7.095.48129%
Revenue1.16B522M222%
Total Cash986M401M246%
Total Debt620M45.2M1,372%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZLYF vs FACO: Fundamental Ratings
BZLYF
FACO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
511
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2429
SMR RATING
1..100
5155
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
205
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
32n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FACO's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLYF (81). This means that FACO’s stock grew similarly to BZLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BZLYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as FACO (29). This means that BZLYF’s stock grew similarly to FACO’s over the last 12 months.

BZLYF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as FACO (55). This means that BZLYF’s stock grew similarly to FACO’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLYF (64). This means that FACO’s stock grew similarly to BZLYF’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLYF (20). This means that FACO’s stock grew similarly to BZLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZLYFFACO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FACO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HKDGBP0.10N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - United Kingdom Pound
HESAX45.81N/A
N/A
Horizon Defensive Core Advisor
LSAGX24.12N/A
N/A
Loomis Sayles Global Growth A
RUBUSD0.01N/A
N/A
Russia Ruble - United States Dollar
EURCHF0.94N/A
N/A
Euro - Switzerland Franc

BZLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZLYF and ACMTA have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZLYF and ACMTA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZLYF
1D Price
Change %
BZLYF100%
+1.90%
ACMTA - BZLYF
17%
Poorly correlated
-23.85%
HIPO - BZLYF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
TRRSF - BZLYF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
FACO - BZLYF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
RYAN - BZLYF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
More

FACO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FACO and HIPO have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FACO and HIPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FACO
1D Price
Change %
FACO100%
+0.29%
HIPO - FACO
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
TRRSF - FACO
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
LCSHF - FACO
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZLYF - FACO
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
JTGPF - FACO
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More