BZLYF
Price
$11.89
Change
+$0.71 (+6.35%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.84B
FACO
Price
$3.41
Change
-$0.15 (-4.21%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
125.04M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZLYF vs FACO

Header iconBZLYF vs FACO Comparison
Open Charts BZLYF vs FACOBanner chart's image
Beazley
Price$11.89
Change+$0.71 (+6.35%)
Volume$742
Capitalization6.84B
First Acceptance
Price$3.41
Change-$0.15 (-4.21%)
Volume$1.81K
Capitalization125.04M
BZLYF vs FACO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BZLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FACO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZLYF vs. FACO commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZLYF is a Hold and FACO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BZLYF: $11.89 vs. FACO: $3.41)
Brand notoriety: BZLYF and FACO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZLYF: 27% vs. FACO: 35%
Market capitalization -- BZLYF: $6.84B vs. FACO: $125.04M
BZLYF [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $6.84B. FACO’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $125.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $16.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZLYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFACO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BZLYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FACO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FACO is a better buy in the long-term than BZLYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZLYF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FACO’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZLYF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FACO’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZLYF is a better buy in the short-term than FACO.

Price Growth

BZLYF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +2.46% price change this week, while FACO (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -3.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-0.91% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZLYF($6.84B) has a higher market cap than FACO($125M). BZLYF has higher P/E ratio than FACO: BZLYF (7.87) vs FACO (5.50). BZLYF YTD gains are higher at: 19.031 vs. FACO (12.607). BZLYF has more cash in the bank: 986M vs. FACO (401M). FACO has less debt than BZLYF: FACO (45.2M) vs BZLYF (620M). BZLYF has higher revenues than FACO: BZLYF (1.16B) vs FACO (522M).
BZLYFFACOBZLYF / FACO
Capitalization6.84B125M5,471%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.03112.607151%
P/E Ratio7.875.50143%
Revenue1.16B522M222%
Total Cash986M401M246%
Total Debt620M45.2M1,372%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZLYF vs FACO: Fundamental Ratings
BZLYF
FACO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2914
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1929
SMR RATING
1..100
5255
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5953
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
154
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FACO's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLYF (87). This means that FACO’s stock grew similarly to BZLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BZLYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as FACO (29). This means that BZLYF’s stock grew similarly to FACO’s over the last 12 months.

BZLYF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as FACO (55). This means that BZLYF’s stock grew similarly to FACO’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLYF (59). This means that FACO’s stock grew similarly to BZLYF’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLYF (15). This means that FACO’s stock grew similarly to BZLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZLYFFACO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
48%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FACO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HYGH86.67-0.11
-0.13%
iShares Interest Rate Hdg Hi Yld Bd ETF
BFOR80.57-0.59
-0.73%
Barron's 400 ETF
VIOG120.44-1.04
-0.85%
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
MEMX34.60-0.31
-0.89%
Matthews Emerging Markets Ex Chn Act ETF
XYZY8.88-0.34
-3.71%
YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF

BZLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZLYF and ACMTA have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZLYF and ACMTA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZLYF
1D Price
Change %
BZLYF100%
+6.31%
ACMTA - BZLYF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HIPO - BZLYF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
TRRSF - BZLYF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
FACO - BZLYF
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.26%
RYAN - BZLYF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
More

FACO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FACO and HIPO have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FACO and HIPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FACO
1D Price
Change %
FACO100%
-4.26%
HIPO - FACO
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
TRRSF - FACO
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
LCSHF - FACO
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZLYF - FACO
5%
Poorly correlated
+6.31%
JTGPF - FACO
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More