BZLYF
Price
$12.37
Change
-$0.19 (-1.51%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.74B
FACO
Price
$3.21
Change
-$0.01 (-0.31%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
32.93M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZLYF vs FACO

Header iconBZLYF vs FACO Comparison
Open Charts BZLYF vs FACOBanner chart's image
Beazley
Price$12.37
Change-$0.19 (-1.51%)
Volume$200
Capitalization4.74B
First Acceptance
Price$3.21
Change-$0.01 (-0.31%)
Volume$2.6K
Capitalization32.93M
BZLYF vs FACO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BZLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FACO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZLYF vs. FACO commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZLYF is a Hold and FACO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BZLYF: $12.36 vs. FACO: $3.21)
Brand notoriety: BZLYF and FACO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZLYF: 4% vs. FACO: 29%
Market capitalization -- BZLYF: $4.74B vs. FACO: $32.93M
BZLYF [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $4.74B. FACO’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $32.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $14.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZLYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFACO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BZLYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FACO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZLYF is a better buy in the long-term than FACO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZLYF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FACO’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZLYF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FACO’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZLYF is a better buy in the short-term than FACO.

Price Growth

BZLYF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -4.41% price change this week, while FACO (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -1.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

FACO is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (+0.83% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZLYF($4.74B) has a higher market cap than FACO($32.9M). BZLYF has higher P/E ratio than FACO: BZLYF (26.67) vs FACO (12.12). BZLYF YTD gains are higher at: 23.786 vs. FACO (5.941). BZLYF has more cash in the bank: 652M vs. FACO (170M). FACO has less debt than BZLYF: FACO (55.4M) vs BZLYF (621M). BZLYF has higher revenues than FACO: BZLYF (3.44B) vs FACO (333M).
BZLYFFACOBZLYF / FACO
Capitalization4.74B32.9M14,407%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.7865.941400%
P/E Ratio26.6712.12220%
Revenue3.44B333M1,034%
Total Cash652M170M384%
Total Debt621M55.4M1,121%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZLYF vs FACO: Fundamental Ratings
BZLYF
FACO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
627
SMR RATING
1..100
9052
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
224
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FACO's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLYF (90). This means that FACO’s stock grew similarly to BZLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BZLYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as FACO (27). This means that BZLYF’s stock grew similarly to FACO’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BZLYF (90). This means that FACO’s stock grew somewhat faster than BZLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BZLYF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FACO (62). This means that BZLYF’s stock grew similarly to FACO’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLYF (22). This means that FACO’s stock grew similarly to BZLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZLYFFACO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FACO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LISMF0.130.02
+20.93%
Lithium South Dev Corp.
WLMIY23.080.24
+1.07%
Wilmar International, Ltd.
BCRD6.25N/A
N/A
BlueOne Card Inc.
BYDGF160.55N/A
N/A
BOYD GROUP SVCS INC.
SSRSF0.03N/A
N/A
Silver Sands Resources Corp.

BZLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZLYF and ACMTA have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZLYF and ACMTA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZLYF
1D Price
Change %
BZLYF100%
-1.47%
ACMTA - BZLYF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HIPO - BZLYF
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
TRRSF - BZLYF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FACO - BZLYF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
RYAN - BZLYF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
More

FACO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FACO and HIPO have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FACO and HIPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FACO
1D Price
Change %
FACO100%
-0.31%
HIPO - FACO
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
TRRSF - FACO
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LCSHF - FACO
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZLYF - FACO
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
JTGPF - FACO
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More