BZQIF
Price
$1.94
Change
+$0.15 (+8.43%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
5.52B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CGEAF
Price
$46.73
Change
-$0.26 (-0.55%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.98B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZQIF vs CGEAF

Header iconBZQIF vs CGEAF Comparison
Open Charts BZQIF vs CGEAFBanner chart's image
Bezeq The Israel Telecommunication
Price$1.94
Change+$0.15 (+8.43%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.52B
Cogeco Communications
Price$46.73
Change-$0.26 (-0.55%)
Volume$3.9K
Capitalization1.98B
BZQIF vs CGEAF Comparison Chart in %
BZQIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CGEAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZQIF vs. CGEAF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZQIF is a Hold and CGEAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BZQIF: $1.93 vs. CGEAF: $46.02)
Brand notoriety: BZQIF and CGEAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZQIF: 7% vs. CGEAF: 13%
Market capitalization -- BZQIF: $5.52B vs. CGEAF: $1.98B
BZQIF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $5.52B. CGEAF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $1.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $236.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZQIF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCGEAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BZQIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CGEAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZQIF is a better buy in the long-term than CGEAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZQIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGEAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZQIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CGEAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZQIF is a better buy in the short-term than CGEAF.

Price Growth

BZQIF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +8.95% price change this week, while CGEAF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -2.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.04% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZQIF($5.52B) has a higher market cap than CGEAF($1.98B). BZQIF has higher P/E ratio than CGEAF: BZQIF (12.59) vs CGEAF (8.51). BZQIF YTD gains are higher at: 78.506 vs. CGEAF (-1.704). BZQIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.73B vs. CGEAF (1.41B). BZQIF has more cash in the bank: 2.58B vs. CGEAF (75.2M). CGEAF has less debt than BZQIF: CGEAF (4.56B) vs BZQIF (9.45B). BZQIF has higher revenues than CGEAF: BZQIF (8.81B) vs CGEAF (2.91B).
BZQIFCGEAFBZQIF / CGEAF
Capitalization5.52B1.98B279%
EBITDA3.73B1.41B264%
Gain YTD78.506-1.704-4,606%
P/E Ratio12.598.51148%
Revenue8.81B2.91B303%
Total Cash2.58B75.2M3,432%
Total Debt9.45B4.56B207%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZQIF vs CGEAF: Fundamental Ratings
BZQIF
CGEAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4490
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50100
SMR RATING
1..100
2093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4858
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2147
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BZQIF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as CGEAF (32). This means that BZQIF’s stock grew similarly to CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGEAF (100). This means that BZQIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIF's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CGEAF (93). This means that BZQIF’s stock grew significantly faster than CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CGEAF (58). This means that BZQIF’s stock grew similarly to CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as CGEAF (47). This means that BZQIF’s stock grew similarly to CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZQIFCGEAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZQIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CGEAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSICX47.86N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index C
JAMEX37.68N/A
N/A
Jamestown Equity
MNMCX15.00N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
AGWUX67.76N/A
N/A
American Century Growth R5
ACAEX13.89N/A
N/A
American Century International Gr G

BZQIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZQIF and CHRYY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZQIF and CHRYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZQIF
1D Price
Change %
BZQIF100%
N/A
CHRYY - BZQIF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
BGAOY - BZQIF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGEAF - BZQIF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
BTGOF - BZQIF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.78%
CGECF - BZQIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CGEAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGEAF and CGECF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGEAF and CGECF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGEAF
1D Price
Change %
CGEAF100%
-1.52%
CGECF - CGEAF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVHSY - CGEAF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGAOY - CGEAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTGOF - CGEAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.78%
BZQIF - CGEAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More