BZQIF
Price
$1.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.63B
CGEAF
Price
$50.06
Change
-$0.09 (-0.18%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.24B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZQIF vs CGEAF

Header iconBZQIF vs CGEAF Comparison
Open Charts BZQIF vs CGEAFBanner chart's image
Bezeq The Israel Telecommunication
Price$1.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.63B
Cogeco Communications
Price$50.06
Change-$0.09 (-0.18%)
Volume$954
Capitalization2.24B
BZQIF vs CGEAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BZQIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZQIF vs. CGEAF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZQIF is a Hold and CGEAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BZQIF: $1.75 vs. CGEAF: $50.06)
Brand notoriety: BZQIF and CGEAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZQIF: 67% vs. CGEAF: 106%
Market capitalization -- BZQIF: $3.63B vs. CGEAF: $2.24B
BZQIF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $3.63B. CGEAF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $2.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZQIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCGEAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BZQIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CGEAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZQIF is a better buy in the long-term than CGEAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZQIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGEAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZQIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CGEAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGEAF is a better buy in the short-term than BZQIF.

Price Growth

BZQIF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +24.11% price change this week, while CGEAF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.68% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZQIF($3.63B) has a higher market cap than CGEAF($2.24B). BZQIF has higher P/E ratio than CGEAF: BZQIF (12.45) vs CGEAF (7.40). BZQIF YTD gains are higher at: 61.439 vs. CGEAF (6.920). BZQIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.5B vs. CGEAF (1.39B). BZQIF has more cash in the bank: 2.41B vs. CGEAF (365M). CGEAF has less debt than BZQIF: CGEAF (5.1B) vs BZQIF (9.58B). BZQIF has higher revenues than CGEAF: BZQIF (9.08B) vs CGEAF (2.97B).
BZQIFCGEAFBZQIF / CGEAF
Capitalization3.63B2.24B162%
EBITDA3.5B1.39B252%
Gain YTD61.4396.920888%
P/E Ratio12.457.40168%
Revenue9.08B2.97B306%
Total Cash2.41B365M661%
Total Debt9.58B5.1B188%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZQIF vs CGEAF: Fundamental Ratings
BZQIF
CGEAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49100
SMR RATING
1..100
2396
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4253
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2022
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGEAF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as BZQIF (35). This means that CGEAF’s stock grew similarly to BZQIF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGEAF (100). This means that BZQIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIF's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CGEAF (96). This means that BZQIF’s stock grew significantly faster than CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CGEAF (53). This means that BZQIF’s stock grew similarly to CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as CGEAF (22). This means that BZQIF’s stock grew similarly to CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZQIFCGEAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZQIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAFFX44.070.40
+0.92%
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Inst
SJVAX30.070.22
+0.74%
Steward Large Cap Value A
MLVHX19.560.11
+0.57%
MFS Low Volatility Equity I
VISVX48.370.24
+0.50%
Vanguard Small Cap Value Index Inv
GCIAX16.620.01
+0.06%
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts A

BZQIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZQIF and CHRYY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZQIF and CHRYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZQIF
1D Price
Change %
BZQIF100%
N/A
CHRYY - BZQIF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
BGAOY - BZQIF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGEAF - BZQIF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTGOF - BZQIF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGECF - BZQIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CGEAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGEAF and CGECF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGEAF and CGECF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGEAF
1D Price
Change %
CGEAF100%
N/A
CGECF - CGEAF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVHSY - CGEAF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGAOY - CGEAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTGOF - CGEAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZQIF - CGEAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More