BZTAF
Price
$10.46
Change
+$0.43 (+4.29%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
661.13M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
NXGPY
Price
$86.06
Change
+$2.31 (+2.76%)
Updated
Oct 15 closing price
Capitalization
19.9B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZTAF vs NXGPY

Header iconBZTAF vs NXGPY Comparison
Open Charts BZTAF vs NXGPYBanner chart's image
Boozt AB
Price$10.46
Change+$0.43 (+4.29%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization661.13M
Next Group
Price$86.06
Change+$2.31 (+2.76%)
Volume$1.21K
Capitalization19.9B
BZTAF vs NXGPY Comparison Chart in %
NXGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZTAF vs. NXGPY commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZTAF is a Hold and NXGPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BZTAF: $10.46 vs. NXGPY: $86.06)
Brand notoriety: BZTAF and NXGPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZTAF: 100% vs. NXGPY: 91%
Market capitalization -- BZTAF: $667.36M vs. NXGPY: $20.42B
BZTAF [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] is valued at $667.36M. NXGPY’s [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] market capitalization is $20.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry ranges from $175.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry is $16.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZTAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNXGPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BZTAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NXGPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NXGPY is a better buy in the long-term than BZTAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NXGPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NXGPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BZTAF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NXGPY (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was +2.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear Retail (+2.89% weekly)

Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NXGPY($19.9B) has a higher market cap than BZTAF($661M). BZTAF has higher P/E ratio than NXGPY: BZTAF (32.71) vs NXGPY (19.59). NXGPY YTD gains are higher at: 34.267 vs. BZTAF (0.000). NXGPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.48B vs. BZTAF (790M). NXGPY has more cash in the bank: 441M vs. BZTAF (376M). BZTAF has less debt than NXGPY: BZTAF (796M) vs NXGPY (1.99B). BZTAF has higher revenues than NXGPY: BZTAF (8.23B) vs NXGPY (6.4B).
BZTAFNXGPYBZTAF / NXGPY
Capitalization661M19.9B3%
EBITDA790M1.48B53%
Gain YTD0.00034.267-
P/E Ratio32.7119.59167%
Revenue8.23B6.4B129%
Total Cash376M441M85%
Total Debt796M1.99B40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NXGPY: Fundamental Ratings
NXGPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZTAFNXGPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NXGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MOTI38.080.21
+0.54%
VanEck Morningstar Intl Moat ETF
SAWG21.90N/A
N/A
AAM Sawgrass U.S. Lg Cp Qual Gr ETF
JAAA50.58-0.02
-0.04%
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
PSCQ28.84-0.08
-0.28%
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (Oct) ETF
IHF50.21-0.18
-0.36%
iShares US Healthcare Providers ETF

BZTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZTAF and RTMAF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZTAF and RTMAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZTAF
1D Price
Change %
BZTAF100%
N/A
RTMAF - BZTAF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NXGPY - BZTAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NXGPF - BZTAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XTEPY - BZTAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+9.91%
RTMNF - BZTAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NXGPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NXGPY and DBGI have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NXGPY and DBGI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NXGPY
1D Price
Change %
NXGPY100%
N/A
DBGI - NXGPY
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.30%
NXGPF - NXGPY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTMAF - NXGPY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CURV - NXGPY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RROTF - NXGPY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More