BZUN
Price
$2.38
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 28 closing price
Capitalization
137.31M
23 days until earnings call
LITB
Price
$1.51
Change
-$0.12 (-7.36%)
Updated
Apr 28 closing price
Capitalization
27.71M
Ad is loading...

BZUN vs LITB

Header iconBZUN vs LITB Comparison
Open Charts BZUN vs LITBBanner chart's image
Baozun
Price$2.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$140.34K
Capitalization137.31M
LightInTheBox Holding
Price$1.51
Change-$0.12 (-7.36%)
Volume$16.25K
Capitalization27.71M
BZUN vs LITB Comparison Chart
Loading...
BZUN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZUN vs. LITB commentary
Apr 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZUN is a StrongBuy and LITB is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BZUN: $2.38 vs. LITB: $1.51)
Brand notoriety: BZUN: Notable vs. LITB: Not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZUN: 43% vs. LITB: 26%
Market capitalization -- BZUN: $137.31M vs. LITB: $27.71M
BZUN [@Internet Retail] is valued at $137.31M. LITB’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $27.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $1.99T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $38.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZUN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLITB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BZUN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LITB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LITB is a better buy in the long-term than BZUN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZUN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LITB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZUN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LITB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LITB is a better buy in the short-term than BZUN.

Price Growth

BZUN (@Internet Retail) experienced а +8.18% price change this week, while LITB (@Internet Retail) price change was -18.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +100.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

BZUN is expected to report earnings on May 22, 2025.

LITB is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+4.42% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZUN($137M) has a higher market cap than LITB($27.7M). LITB YTD gains are higher at: -10.292 vs. BZUN (-12.500). LITB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -7.21M vs. BZUN (-161.8M). BZUN has more cash in the bank: 2.33B vs. LITB (15M). LITB has less debt than BZUN: LITB (5.06M) vs BZUN (2.52B). BZUN has higher revenues than LITB: BZUN (8.9B) vs LITB (333M).
BZUNLITBBZUN / LITB
Capitalization137M27.7M495%
EBITDA-161.8M-7.21M2,244%
Gain YTD-12.500-10.292121%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue8.9B333M2,674%
Total Cash2.33B15M15,533%
Total Debt2.52B5.06M49,733%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZUN vs LITB: Fundamental Ratings
BZUN
LITB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
581
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9198
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9615
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5012

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BZUN's Valuation (56) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LITB (99) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that BZUN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LITB’s over the last 12 months.

BZUN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry is in the same range as LITB (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that BZUN’s stock grew similarly to LITB’s over the last 12 months.

BZUN's SMR Rating (91) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry is in the same range as LITB (98) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that BZUN’s stock grew similarly to LITB’s over the last 12 months.

LITB's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Internet Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BZUN (83) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that LITB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BZUN’s over the last 12 months.

LITB's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Internet Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for BZUN (96) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that LITB’s stock grew significantly faster than BZUN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZUNLITB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BZUN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEDYX33.86N/A
N/A
Invesco EQV European Equity Y
HFMRX26.73N/A
N/A
Hartford MidCap R3
TFOAX68.75N/A
N/A
Touchstone Focused A
CICGX10.10N/A
N/A
AB Concentrated International Growth C
WCMYX9.82N/A
N/A
WCM Quality Dividend Growth Inst

BZUN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BZUN has been loosely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BZUN jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZUN
1D Price
Change %
BZUN100%
N/A
BABA - BZUN
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
MPNGY - BZUN
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
JD - BZUN
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
RERE - BZUN
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
DADA - BZUN
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
More

LITB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LITB and PDD have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LITB and PDD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LITB
1D Price
Change %
LITB100%
-7.54%
PDD - LITB
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
JD - LITB
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
BZUN - LITB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPNG - LITB
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
BABA - LITB
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
More