It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BZZUF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTGLS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BZZUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGLS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BZZUF (@Construction Materials) experienced а +1.74% price change this week, while TGLS (@Construction Materials) price change was +3.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.67%.
TGLS is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.
Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
BZZUF | TGLS | BZZUF / TGLS | |
Capitalization | 7.28B | 2.45B | 298% |
EBITDA | 1.34B | 292M | 460% |
Gain YTD | 46.203 | -2.240 | -2,063% |
P/E Ratio | 8.53 | 13.39 | 64% |
Revenue | 4.27B | 833M | 512% |
Total Cash | 943M | 132M | 714% |
Total Debt | 791M | 170M | 465% |
BZZUF | TGLS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BZZUF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as TGLS (18) in the Building Products industry. This means that BZZUF’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.
TGLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as BZZUF (16) in the null industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew similarly to BZZUF’s over the last 12 months.
TGLS's SMR Rating (35) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as BZZUF (43) in the null industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew similarly to BZZUF’s over the last 12 months.
BZZUF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as TGLS (50) in the Building Products industry. This means that BZZUF’s stock grew similarly to TGLS’s over the last 12 months.
TGLS's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as BZZUF (31) in the null industry. This means that TGLS’s stock grew similarly to BZZUF’s over the last 12 months.
BZZUF | TGLS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago89% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago36% | 2 days ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago87% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago38% | 2 days ago89% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
MLACX | 4.78 | 0.04 | +0.84% |
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Class C | |||
NBRTX | 26.93 | 0.16 | +0.60% |
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val Inst | |||
PABVX | 16.06 | 0.06 | +0.37% |
Principal MidCap Value I R5 | |||
GIIAX | 10.26 | -0.02 | -0.19% |
Nationwide International Index A | |||
BACCX | 12.91 | -0.07 | -0.54% |
BlackRock Energy Opportunities Inv C |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BZZUF and TGLS have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZZUF and TGLS's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BZZUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BZZUF | 100% | N/A | ||
TGLS - BZZUF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
CARCY - BZZUF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
LOMA - BZZUF | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.48% | ||
BZZUY - BZZUF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
AHCHY - BZZUF | 5% Poorly correlated | -3.40% | ||
More |