BZZUY
Price
$26.40
Change
-$0.67 (-2.48%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
5.27B
71 days until earnings call
CBUMF
Price
$0.55
Change
+$0.12 (+27.91%)
Updated
Feb 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZZUY vs CBUMF

Header iconBZZUY vs CBUMF Comparison
Open Charts BZZUY vs CBUMFBanner chart's image
Buzzi SpA
Price$26.40
Change-$0.67 (-2.48%)
Volume$578
Capitalization5.27B
China National Buildings Material
Price$0.55
Change+$0.12 (+27.91%)
Volume$1.15K
Capitalization5.3B
BZZUY vs CBUMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZZUY vs. CBUMF commentary
May 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZZUY is a Hold and CBUMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BZZUY: $26.40 vs. CBUMF: $0.55)
Brand notoriety: BZZUY and CBUMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZZUY: 6% vs. CBUMF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BZZUY: $5.27B vs. CBUMF: $5.3B
BZZUY [@Construction Materials] is valued at $5.27B. CBUMF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $5.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZZUY’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileCBUMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BZZUY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • CBUMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZZUY is a better buy in the long-term than CBUMF.

Price Growth

BZZUY (@Construction Materials) experienced а +1.14% price change this week, while CBUMF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

BZZUY is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-2.71% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBUMF($5.3B) and BZZUY($5.27B) have the same market capitalization . BZZUY has higher P/E ratio than CBUMF: BZZUY (11.09) vs CBUMF (4.27). BZZUY YTD gains are higher at: 51.212 vs. CBUMF (28.163). CBUMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.6B vs. BZZUY (1.02B). CBUMF has higher revenues than BZZUY: CBUMF (261B) vs BZZUY (4B).
BZZUYCBUMFBZZUY / CBUMF
Capitalization5.27B5.3B99%
EBITDA1.02B35.6B3%
Gain YTD51.21228.163182%
P/E Ratio11.094.27260%
Revenue4B261B2%
Total CashN/A44.1B-
Total DebtN/A188B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZZUY vs CBUMF: Fundamental Ratings
BZZUY
CBUMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11100
SMR RATING
1..100
23100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
266
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBUMF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUY (14). This means that CBUMF’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBUMF (100). This means that BZZUY’s stock grew significantly faster than CBUMF’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBUMF (100). This means that BZZUY’s stock grew significantly faster than CBUMF’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUY (41). This means that CBUMF’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUY (26). This means that CBUMF’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDICX10.72-0.03
-0.28%
Eaton Vance Global Income Builder C
VRTVX258.76-0.82
-0.32%
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index I
LCBVX38.68-0.13
-0.33%
ClearBridge Large Cap Value R
BLPIX70.97-0.48
-0.67%
ProFunds Bull Inv
ERASX40.31-0.54
-1.32%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R6

BZZUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZZUY and HDLMY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZZUY and HDLMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZZUY
1D Price
Change %
BZZUY100%
N/A
HDLMY - BZZUY
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
HCMLY - BZZUY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
EXP - BZZUY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
CX - BZZUY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
JHX - BZZUY
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
More

CBUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBUMF and CBUMY have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBUMF and CBUMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBUMF
1D Price
Change %
CBUMF100%
N/A
CBUMY - CBUMF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CARCY - CBUMF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZZUY - CBUMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLS - CBUMF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
AHCHY - CBUMF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
More