BZZUY
Price
$19.43
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
19 days until earnings call
HCMLY
Price
$19.24
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

BZZUY vs HCMLY

Header iconBZZUY vs HCMLY Comparison
Open Charts BZZUY vs HCMLYBanner chart's image
Buzzi SpA
Price$19.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$989
CapitalizationN/A
HOLCIM
Price$19.24
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$40.98K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BZZUY vs HCMLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BZZUY vs. HCMLY commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZZUY is a Hold and HCMLY is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BZZUY: $19.17 vs. HCMLY: $19.48)
Brand notoriety: BZZUY and HCMLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZZUY: 214% vs. HCMLY: 56%
Market capitalization -- BZZUY: $5.27B vs. HCMLY: $39.08B
BZZUY [@Construction Materials] is valued at $5.27B. HCMLY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $39.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZZUY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHCMLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BZZUY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HCMLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZZUY is a better buy in the long-term than HCMLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCMLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HCMLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BZZUY (@Construction Materials) experienced а -2.04% price change this week, while HCMLY (@Construction Materials) price change was +0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

BZZUY is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+3.13% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMLY($39.1B) has a higher market cap than BZZUY($5.27B). BZZUY has higher P/E ratio than HCMLY: BZZUY (11.09) vs HCMLY (10.41). HCMLY YTD gains are higher at: 27.111 vs. BZZUY (24.734). HCMLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.78B vs. BZZUY (1.02B). HCMLY has higher revenues than BZZUY: HCMLY (27.6B) vs BZZUY (4B).
BZZUYHCMLYBZZUY / HCMLY
Capitalization5.27B39.1B13%
EBITDA1.02B7.78B13%
Gain YTD24.73427.11191%
P/E Ratio11.0910.41107%
Revenue4B27.6B14%
Total CashN/A3.65B-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZZUY vs HCMLY: Fundamental Ratings
BZZUY
HCMLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2480
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
218
SMR RATING
1..100
4498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8067
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCMLY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUY (13). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUY (21). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCMLY (98). This means that BZZUY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUY (51). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUY (80). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCMLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

BZZUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZZUY and HDELY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZZUY and HDELY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZZUY
1D Price
Change %
BZZUY100%
N/A
HDELY - BZZUY
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
HCMLY - BZZUY
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
EXP - BZZUY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
CX - BZZUY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
JHX - BZZUY
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
More

HCMLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMLY has been closely correlated with HDELY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCMLY jumps, then HDELY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMLY
1D Price
Change %
HCMLY100%
-1.28%
HDELY - HCMLY
67%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
CRH - HCMLY
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
EXP - HCMLY
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
VMC - HCMLY
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
SUM - HCMLY
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.81%
More