Advertisement
C vs EPAM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is C is a StrongBuy and EPAM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
C’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileEPAM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- C’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- EPAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
C’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- C’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- EPAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
C (@Major Banks) experienced а -4.41% price change this week, while EPAM (@Information Technology Services) price change was -11.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.60%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -4.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +91.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.27%.
Reported Earning Dates
C is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2025.
EPAM is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Banks (-1.41% weekly)Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
@Information Technology Services (-4.36% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
| C | EPAM | C / EPAM | |
| Capitalization | 121B | 8.55B | 1,415% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 670M | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.413 | -35.425 | -91% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.71 | 21.12 | 74% |
| Revenue | 78.5B | 4.86B | 1,614% |
| Total Cash | 27.3B | 1.17B | 2,325% |
| Total Debt | 324B | 158M | 205,063% |
C | EPAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
C's Valuation (41) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as EPAM (63) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
C's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for EPAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that C’s stock grew significantly faster than EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
C's SMR Rating (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAM (63) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that C’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
C's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAM (64) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that C’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
C's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as EPAM (82) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
| C | EPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 65% | 11 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GTIP | 49.49 | 0.34 | +0.70% |
| Goldman Sachs Acs Infl Protd USD Bd ETF | |||
| ISVL | 42.03 | 0.15 | +0.35% |
| iShares Intl Dev Sm Cp Val Fctr ETF | |||
| EQAL | 49.29 | -0.55 | -1.10% |
| Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF | |||
| SPTM | 75.32 | -1.19 | -1.56% |
| SPDR® Port S&P 1500 Comps Stk Mkt ETF | |||
| MSSM | 46.74 | -0.85 | -1.78% |
| Morgan Stanley Pathway Sm-Md Cp Eq ETF | |||
EPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAM has been closely correlated with CTSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPAM jumps, then CTSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAM | 100% | -4.26% | ||
| CTSH - EPAM | 66% Closely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| KD - EPAM | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.68% | ||
| ACN - EPAM | 62% Loosely correlated | -4.39% | ||
| GLOB - EPAM | 59% Loosely correlated | -5.31% | ||
| FLYW - EPAM | 59% Loosely correlated | -4.78% | ||
More | ||||