CABPF
Price
$0.69
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
175.7M
SCBFY
Price
$39.20
Change
-$0.28 (-0.71%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
44.52B
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CABPF vs SCBFY

Header iconCABPF vs SCBFY Comparison
Open Charts CABPF vs SCBFYBanner chart's image
CAB PMTS
Price$0.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.5K
Capitalization175.7M
Standard Chartered
Price$39.20
Change-$0.28 (-0.71%)
Volume$47.16K
Capitalization44.52B
CABPF vs SCBFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CABPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CABPF vs. SCBFY commentary
Oct 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CABPF is a Hold and SCBFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CABPF: $0.69 vs. SCBFY: $39.20)
Brand notoriety: CABPF and SCBFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CABPF: 301% vs. SCBFY: 38%
Market capitalization -- CABPF: $175.7M vs. SCBFY: $44.52B
CABPF [@Major Banks] is valued at $175.7M. SCBFY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $44.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $869.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $133.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CABPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBFY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CABPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCBFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFY is a better buy in the long-term than CABPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CABPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBFY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CABPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCBFY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CABPF is a better buy in the short-term than SCBFY.

Price Growth

CABPF (@Major Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCBFY (@Major Banks) price change was -0.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +135.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCBFY is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.28% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCBFY($44.5B) has a higher market cap than CABPF($176M). CABPF has higher P/E ratio than SCBFY: CABPF (17.68) vs SCBFY (10.77). SCBFY YTD gains are higher at: 61.068 vs. CABPF (-21.491). CABPF has less debt than SCBFY: CABPF (18.5M) vs SCBFY (99.4B). SCBFY has higher revenues than CABPF: SCBFY (20.5B) vs CABPF (101M).
CABPFSCBFYCABPF / SCBFY
Capitalization176M44.5B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-21.49161.068-35%
P/E Ratio17.6810.77164%
Revenue101M20.5B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt18.5M99.4B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCBFY: Fundamental Ratings
SCBFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
22
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7
SMR RATING
1..100
6
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CABPFSCBFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CABPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTNSX14.02N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq S
ACEVX11.01N/A
N/A
American Century International Val Inv
LYRNX14.49N/A
N/A
Lyrical International Value Equity Inv
VVIEX14.07N/A
N/A
VOYA VACS Index Series EM Portfolio
HFAHX16.36N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders Intl Cntrrn Val Y

CABPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CABPF and WEBNF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CABPF and WEBNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CABPF
1D Price
Change %
CABPF100%
N/A
WEBNF - CABPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+10.09%
SCBFY - CABPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
ANZGY - CABPF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
ANZGF - CABPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVNLF - CABPF
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
More

SCBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFY has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFY jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFY
1D Price
Change %
SCBFY100%
-0.72%
HSBC - SCBFY
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
BCS - SCBFY
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
ING - SCBFY
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
SAN - SCBFY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
SCBFF - SCBFY
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
More