CABPF
Price
$0.57
Change
-$0.03 (-5.00%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
WEBNF
Price
$21.14
Change
-$0.36 (-1.67%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
52.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CABPF vs WEBNF

Header iconCABPF vs WEBNF Comparison
Open Charts CABPF vs WEBNFBanner chart's image
CAB PMTS
Price$0.57
Change-$0.03 (-5.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
Westpac Banking
Price$21.14
Change-$0.36 (-1.67%)
Volume$500
Capitalization52.34B
CABPF vs WEBNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CABPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WEBNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CABPF vs. WEBNF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CABPF is a Hold and WEBNF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CABPF: $0.57 vs. WEBNF: $21.14)
Brand notoriety: CABPF and WEBNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CABPF: 35% vs. WEBNF: 20%
Market capitalization -- CABPF: $0 vs. WEBNF: $52.34B
CABPF [@Major Banks] is valued at $0. WEBNF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $52.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CABPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWEBNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CABPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WEBNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WEBNF is a better buy in the long-term than CABPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CABPF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WEBNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CABPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • WEBNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CABPF is a better buy in the short-term than WEBNF.

Price Growth

CABPF (@Major Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WEBNF (@Major Banks) price change was -1.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.53% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WEBNF YTD gains are higher at: 13.629 vs. CABPF (-35.251).
CABPFWEBNFCABPF / WEBNF
CapitalizationN/A52.3B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-35.25113.629-259%
P/E RatioN/A12.44-
RevenueN/A21.2B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A180B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WEBNF: Fundamental Ratings
WEBNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
42
SMR RATING
1..100
3
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CABPFWEBNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CABPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WEBNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AENT5.340.78
+17.11%
Alliance Entertainment Holding Corp
TRU91.611.45
+1.61%
TransUnion
NBBK18.760.13
+0.70%
NB Bancorp
HUBG35.76-0.31
-0.86%
Hub Group
PMCB1.11-0.03
-2.63%
PharmaCyte Biotech

CABPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CABPF and WEBNF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CABPF and WEBNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CABPF
1D Price
Change %
CABPF100%
N/A
WEBNF - CABPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCBFY - CABPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
ANZGY - CABPF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.00%
ANZGF - CABPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+12.99%
SVNLF - CABPF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
More

WEBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WEBNF has been loosely correlated with ANZGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WEBNF jumps, then ANZGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WEBNF
1D Price
Change %
WEBNF100%
N/A
ANZGY - WEBNF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.00%
NABZY - WEBNF
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
CMWAY - WEBNF
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
BMO - WEBNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
HSBC - WEBNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
More