CAC
Price
$40.43
Change
+$0.78 (+1.97%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
488.28M
33 days until earnings call
FFWM
Price
$5.17
Change
+$0.15 (+2.98%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
407.13M
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAC vs FFWM

Header iconCAC vs FFWM Comparison
Open Charts CAC vs FFWMBanner chart's image
Camden National
Price$40.43
Change+$0.78 (+1.97%)
Volume$957
Capitalization488.28M
First Foundation
Price$5.17
Change+$0.15 (+2.98%)
Volume$12.32K
Capitalization407.13M
CAC vs FFWM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAC vs. FFWM commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAC is a StrongBuy and FFWM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CAC: $40.51 vs. FFWM: $5.18)
Brand notoriety: CAC and FFWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAC: 81% vs. FFWM: 57%
Market capitalization -- CAC: $488.28M vs. FFWM: $407.13M
CAC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $488.28M. FFWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $407.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFFWM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FFWM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAC is a better buy in the long-term than FFWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFWM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FFWM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFWM is a better buy in the short-term than CAC.

Price Growth

CAC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.44% price change this week, while FFWM (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAC($488M) has a higher market cap than FFWM($407M). CAC has higher P/E ratio than FFWM: CAC (10.80) vs FFWM (3.63). CAC YTD gains are higher at: -3.194 vs. FFWM (-16.586). CAC has less debt than FFWM: CAC (329M) vs FFWM (1.58B). FFWM has higher revenues than CAC: FFWM (175M) vs CAC (156M).
CACFFWMCAC / FFWM
Capitalization488M407M120%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.194-16.58619%
P/E Ratio10.803.63297%
Revenue156M175M89%
Total Cash51.5MN/A-
Total Debt329M1.58B21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAC vs FFWM: Fundamental Ratings
CAC
FFWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5956
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55100
SMR RATING
1..100
2533
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2767
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFWM's Valuation (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CAC (54). This means that FFWM’s stock grew similarly to CAC’s over the last 12 months.

CAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (100). This means that CAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

CAC's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (33). This means that CAC’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

CAC's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (60). This means that CAC’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

CAC's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (67). This means that CAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CACFFWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEMGX38.00N/A
N/A
MFS Emerging Markets Equity R3
LAVFX15.28N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
SCSAX16.81N/A
N/A
Allspring Common Stock A
MADSX28.58N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Advantage R6
GMEPX24.62N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs China Equity P

CAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAC has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAC jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAC
1D Price
Change %
CAC100%
+2.17%
TCBK - CAC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.99%
UBSI - CAC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.88%
BHLB - CAC
90%
Closely correlated
+2.19%
TRMK - CAC
89%
Closely correlated
+3.11%
IBOC - CAC
89%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
More

FFWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFWM has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFWM jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWM
1D Price
Change %
FFWM100%
+2.98%
TCBK - FFWM
68%
Closely correlated
+1.99%
HOPE - FFWM
66%
Loosely correlated
+3.14%
CAC - FFWM
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.17%
DCOM - FFWM
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
STEL - FFWM
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
More