CAC
Price
$40.73
Change
+$2.01 (+5.19%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
689.08M
72 days until earnings call
FSBW
Price
$42.38
Change
+$2.48 (+6.22%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
321.93M
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAC vs FSBW

Header iconCAC vs FSBW Comparison
Open Charts CAC vs FSBWBanner chart's image
Camden National
Price$40.73
Change+$2.01 (+5.19%)
Volume$110.84K
Capitalization689.08M
FS Ban
Price$42.38
Change+$2.48 (+6.22%)
Volume$27.96K
Capitalization321.93M
CAC vs FSBW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAC vs. FSBW commentary
Aug 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAC is a StrongBuy and FSBW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CAC: $40.72 vs. FSBW: $42.38)
Brand notoriety: CAC and FSBW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAC: 157% vs. FSBW: 172%
Market capitalization -- CAC: $689.08M vs. FSBW: $321.93M
CAC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $689.08M. FSBW’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $321.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFSBW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSBW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSBW is a better buy in the long-term than CAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSBW’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FSBW’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAC is a better buy in the short-term than FSBW.

Price Growth

CAC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.18% price change this week, while FSBW (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

FSBW is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.28% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAC($689M) has a higher market cap than FSBW($322M). CAC has higher P/E ratio than FSBW: CAC (12.89) vs FSBW (10.21). FSBW YTD gains are higher at: 6.009 vs. CAC (-1.732). CAC has more cash in the bank: 84.5M vs. FSBW (18.7M). FSBW has less debt than CAC: FSBW (292M) vs CAC (420M). CAC has higher revenues than FSBW: CAC (209M) vs FSBW (152M).
CACFSBWCAC / FSBW
Capitalization689M322M214%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.7326.009-29%
P/E Ratio12.8910.21126%
Revenue209M152M138%
Total Cash84.5M18.7M452%
Total Debt420M292M144%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAC vs FSBW: Fundamental Ratings
CAC
FSBW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2529
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5420
SMR RATING
1..100
3537
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5750
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5037
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSBW's Valuation (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CAC (39). This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to CAC’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAC (54). This means that FSBW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAC’s over the last 12 months.

CAC's SMR Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSBW (37). This means that CAC’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CAC (57). This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to CAC’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CAC (50). This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to CAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CACFSBW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TASZX21.080.67
+3.28%
Third Avenue Small Cap Value Z
PMDHX19.960.55
+2.83%
Principal Small-MidCap Dividend Inc R6
RYFCX76.411.51
+2.02%
Rydex Financial Services C
ARIQX11.110.22
+2.02%
Aristotle Value Eq I
LTFOX20.690.20
+0.98%
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3

CAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAC
1D Price
Change %
CAC100%
+5.21%
UBSI - CAC
87%
Closely correlated
+4.93%
TCBK - CAC
86%
Closely correlated
+5.50%
BHLB - CAC
86%
Closely correlated
+4.80%
FCF - CAC
86%
Closely correlated
+5.16%
TRMK - CAC
85%
Closely correlated
+5.12%
More

FSBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBW has been closely correlated with MCBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSBW jumps, then MCBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSBW
1D Price
Change %
FSBW100%
+6.22%
MCBS - FSBW
79%
Closely correlated
+5.62%
CAC - FSBW
78%
Closely correlated
+5.21%
TCBK - FSBW
78%
Closely correlated
+5.50%
FCBC - FSBW
78%
Closely correlated
+5.28%
AROW - FSBW
78%
Closely correlated
+5.38%
More